The housing market is out of whack.
The process of buying a home can be painful, and the unpredictable and counterintuitive dynamics of the current real-estate market don’t help.
Painful, in fact, might be an understatement.
“It was a hellish experience,” Odeta Kushi, who bought a home last year in the D.C. metro area with her husband. One of the homes she had bid on ended up receiving 19 other offers. “That was a house that I really loved,” she said.
When Kushi had begun looking for homes two years ago, she had the exact neighborhood she wanted pinned down. It had a semi-suburban vibe, was in D.C., and had a good school district in case she wanted to expand her family.
Kushi, deputy chief economist at First American, has spent a good portion of her career building a model that can estimate the value of homes, so she knew how much to offer and — crucially — when to step out of the bidding process.
At the time, mortgage rates were about half of what they are in 2023, which made homeownership an even more enticing prospect. And yet Kushi knew it would not be easy.
“I lost bidding war after bidding war,” she told MarketWatch, “because I knew exactly what I was going to pay.”
In 2021, interest rates were relatively low, and competition among buyers and sales prices were high. In 2023, interest rates are high, and yet so are sales prices — and there’s still fierce competition to buy homes.
Bidding wars are back in earnest. In fact, they’ve never really gone away. The housing market has slowed down in the last two years, but rising interest rates have not put a big dent in prices. So what gives?
Buying a house is an emotional experience, so it can be harrowing to pass up on a house you have set your heart on. “I had a lot of heartbreak in the housing search because you get attached to these homes,” Kushi added.
A couple of times, when it looked like it was a done deal, a buyer swept in at the last minute and offered “something absurd above our asking,” Kushi said. “All’s fair in love and housing,” she added.
It’s been more than a year since she’s closed on — and moved into — her new home. Since then, the prospects for buyers have only gotten worse: The 30-year mortgage rate has doubled over the last two years, and is now marching towards 8%.
A stalemate between buyers and sellers
Putting aside homeowners, who either purchased a house with an ultra-low mortgage, or refinanced to secure that low rate, most Americans — from renters to investors to economists — are in equal parts baffled and frustrated with the trajectory of the U.S. housing market.
Home sales are falling, mortgage rates are at the highest level in 22 years, yet the market is still out of reach for many: Home prices are still high, with the median price of a resale home over $400,000.
The biggest problem for the housing market right now, however, is an imbalance between current homeowners and aspiring homeowners: There’s a severe mismatch of incentives and motivations.
Traditionally, the majority of home sales are of homeowners selling their houses to buyers. But homeowners today don’t feel the need to sell, unless they have to for personal reasons, as they probably have low mortgage rates.
Affordability has fallen. If they do move, they will find that — while they may be able to sell their home for a higher price than they bought it — they may only be able to afford a smaller house or a similar-sized house in a less desirable neighborhood.
Compounding that problem, buyers have fewer home listings to choose from. They turn to builders, who offer new homes and even mortgage-rate buydowns to make owning a home a little less expensive. But builders can’t meet all of the demand. They also don’t want to overbuild, having been bit once during the Great Recession.
Some renters have stuck it out, adopting a mentality of “date the rate, buy the house,” choosing to purchase a home that meets their criteria now and to refinance later on in their life.
But the math doesn’t make sense for many other renters. The median rent for a two-bedroom home in the U.S. was nearly $2,000 in July 2023, according to Realtor.com. The same month, the median list price of a home was $440,000 — or over $2,220 in just principal and interest payments.
Even though the real-estate sector has been profoundly impacted — sales are at “rock bottom,” Redfin CEO Glen Kelman told MarketWatch this month — home prices, to the frustration of many, haven’t budged.
Given that rising home values broadly affect how housing costs are calculated in the government’s inflation measures, some economists fear that the resilience in home prices mean that there’s still a long way to go before the U.S. economy cools off.
“We’re in uncharted waters,” Andrew Levin, a former Federal Reserve economist, told MarketWatch. “We’ve never had an increase in mortgage rates that’s been as sharp and sustained as we’ve had in the last year and a half.”
Even home builders, who have seen a sharp increase in demand from home buyers, are worried about high rates killing demand. They’re already seeing traffic of potential buyers drop, and some are building smaller, more affordable homes.
The bottom line: housing inflation will likely “run high for a long time,” Levin added.
Some analysts sound baffled and frustrated. “Housing should be repricing,” Drew Matus, chief market strategist at MetLife said on Bloomberg Surveillance in mid-August. “The fact that it is not, is not a sign of health,” he added. “It is a sign of dysfunction.”
Others have changed their minds about prices correcting, as home buying demand has remained stronger than expected despite higher rates. Goldman Sachs
GS
in August said it expects home prices to rise in 2023 by 1.8%, revising a prior prediction of a drop of 2.2%.
One economist described the current situation as a “tale of two housing markets.” Michael Reid, U.S. economist at RBC Capital Markets, wrote in a note that the data shows a divergence between existing home sales, which have stalled and new home sales, which have surged.
The cost of “shelter” or housing is one of the key components the Federal Reserve uses to measure inflation. One of the Fed’s key tasks is to maintain inflation at a low and steady pace — it has a 2% target — so any major increase in the cost of living will provide more incentive to raise rates.
When the Fed raised interest rates last summer, that prompted mortgage rates to shoot up, and dampened home sales. After raising its benchmark rate in 11 of its last 12 policy meetings, most economists say it’s less likely to hike rates at its next policy meeting in September. In fact, financial markets put the odds close to zero.
Still, with inflation running at an annual rate of 3.2%, primarily driven by high housing costs, the Fed may not be done hiking interest rates and, by extension, mortgage rates may have some room to rise. That would be bad news for both the real-estate industry, and home buyers.
What happened after rates hit 18% in 1981?
The fact that the housing market appears to be out of balance isn’t just due to first-time homebuyers — millennials and Generation Z — lamenting higher rates and home prices. Older generations may point to higher rates and shrug it off as something that younger generations just need to accept. A new normal, if you will. After all, mortgage rates peaked at 18% in 1981.
But Kushi said there’s something people need to remember about how the 1980s played out: monetary policy became extremely tight before inflation improved. “From December of 1979 to January of 1980, interest rates were soaring as the Federal Reserve was combating the ‘Great Inflation,’” she said. “As mortgage rates soared to levels unseen before or since, homes were becoming significantly less affordable and home sales and new construction was falling.”
But by October of 1982, inflation had fallen to 5%, she added. The Fed allowed the Fed funds rate to fall, and as a result the 30-year mortgage rate fell too.
Kushi’s analysis of the 1980s, which she considers a period when housing went into recession much like today, indicates that though the current housing market may be in a dark place, it will stay as such until the Fed hits its target inflation rate, or something else triggers the economy to slow even further.
Meanwhile, the typical home buyer may need to finally make peace with higher-than-normal interest rates. Reid, the RBC economist, noted that for a family earning median income, their monthly mortgage payment with current rates would be 28.5% of their total salary. “That is the highest share in the last 30 years,” Reid wrote, “and well above the sub-20% shares we saw in the previous decade.”
And the imbalance — or the dysfunction — that we’re seeing in the housing market may take a while to iron itself out. Given that the economy and the labor market is strong, it does not seem likely that the Fed will be cutting rates anytime soon, Levin said; the Fed may even need to raise them further.
“It doesn’t seem terribly likely to me that mortgage rates are going to come down very much anytime soon,” he added. “So the housing market we’re seeing now is probably the housing market we’re gonna be seeing for quite a while.”
For those still in the thick of house-hunting, meanwhile, Kushi had one piece of advice: Stick to your gut instinct. Hers was to not overpay for a home.
When Kushi was planning to buy a home, she had been gung-ho about her finances to estimate the couple’s budget. “I had spreadsheets on spreadsheets and spreadsheets, budgeted everything in, how it would impact this part of my discretionary spending, and what rate I was willing to,” Kushi said.
At certain points during a bidding war, she relied on “escalation clauses” to make sure they weren’t going over what she felt was comfortable. An escalation clause is a term used in real estate to specify how much more the potential home buyer is willing to pay than the highest offer and the amount they ultimately want to spend.
Kushi has since become the first homeowner in her immediate family. Although it was not an easy process, she held onto her nerve, stuck to her financial projections, and it paid off.
“I was not willing to budge on price,” she said.
In recent years, studying abroad has become a coveted aspiration for students seeking quality education and global exposure. Among the numerous countries that welcome international students, Germany stands out as a prime destination due to its world-class education system, diverse cultural experiences, and vibrant academic environment. For students hailing from Hyderabad, India, the journey to pursuing education in Germany becomes more manageable and insightful with the assistance of specialized “Study in Germany” consultants. This blog delves into the role and significance of these consultants in facilitating a seamless transition to higher education in Germany.
The German Advantage: Why Study in Germany?
Before we delve into the role of study consultants, it’s essential to understand why Germany has gained prominence as an educational hub. Germany is renowned for its strong emphasis on research, innovation, and academic excellence. The country boasts a plethora of top universities for masters and bachelor, taught in English, catering to various fields of study. Additionally, the relatively low tuition fees, availability of scholarships, and the opportunity to stay back and work post-graduation make it an attractive choice for many international students.
The Role of Study in Germany Consultants
- Guidance and Counseling: Navigating the intricacies of the German education system, application procedures, and program choices can be overwhelming. Study in Germany consultants in Hyderabad are vital in providing personalized guidance and counseling to students. They assess the academic background, interests, and aspirations of each student and suggest German language course, suitable universities and programs accordingly.
- Admission Assistance: Consultants aid students in preparing a compelling application package, including assistance with drafting a statement of purpose (SOP), recommendation letters, and resume for their bachelor’s or masters in Germany. Their expertise helps students present their qualifications and aspirations in the best possible light, increasing their chances of securing admissions to their desired institutions.
- Visa and Documentation Support: Obtaining a student visa for Germany involves adhering to specific requirements and paperwork. Consultants ensure that students understand the visa process clearly and assist them in compiling the necessary documents, preparing for visa interviews, and addressing any concerns that may arise.
- Financial Guidance: One of the major concerns for students planning to study abroad is the financial aspect. German consultants in Hyderabad can provide insights into the cost of living, tuition fees, and available scholarships. They help students make informed decisions regarding their finances and explore funding options.
- Pre-Departure Briefing: Moving to a new country involves adapting to a new culture and lifestyle. Consultants offer pre-departure briefings covering aspects such as accommodation, local customs, healthcare, etc. This helps students transition smoothly to their new environment.

Conclusion
Studying in Germany is a transformative experience that opens doors to a world of opportunities. For students in Hyderabad aspiring to embark on this educational journey, Study in Germany consultants in Hyderabad serve as trusted companions. Their expertise, guidance, and support can turn the complex process of studying abroad into a rewarding and fulfilling endeavor, ensuring that students can make the most of their time in Germany and pave the way for a successful future.
Published: July 31, 2023 at 10:01 a.m. ET
SYDNEY–Australian house prices posted a fifth consecutive rise in July as the market rides a jump in immigration at a time of surging construction costs and falling housing supply.
CoreLogic’s national home value index rose 0.7% in July from June. Since finding a floor in February, prices nationally are up 4.1%, following a 9.1% decline from record highs in April 2022.
Home…
By James Glynn
SYDNEY–Australian house prices posted a fifth consecutive rise in July as the market rides a jump in immigration at a time of surging construction costs and falling housing supply.
CoreLogic’s national home value index rose 0.7% in July from June. Since finding a floor in February, prices nationally are up 4.1%, following a 9.1% decline from record highs in April 2022.
Home values remain 5.3% below the April 2022 peak, with only Perth, Adelaide and regional South Australia recording a new cyclical high in dwelling values through July, according to the property research group.
International border reopening has seen a much bigger than expected lift in immigration with net inflows running at twice the normal level as students and migrants flood in as restrictions on movement imposed during the Covid-19 pandemic are lifted.
Rental vacancy rates have also dropped to historic lows nationally with all major capital city markets now seeing vacancy rates at or materially below 2%, a sign of widespread shortages.
While housing values are continuing to record a broad-based rise, the rate of growth has lost momentum over the past two months, slowing from 1.2% in May, CoreLogic said.
The strength in house prices will concern the Reserve Bank of Australia, with most economists betting it will raise the official cash rate further this month.
The most substantial reduction in house price momentum has occurred in Sydney, said CoreLogic’s research director, Tim Lawless.
After leading the upswing, the monthly pace of growth in Sydney house prices has halved from a recent high of 1.8% in May to 0.9% in July, Lawless said.
Sydney has also seen a significant rise in the number of fresh listings added to the market, 9.9% higher than the same time last year and 18.0% above the previous five-year average, he added.
Write to James Glynn at james.glynn@wsj.com; @JamesGlynnWSJ
Ally Liu, 27, graduated from Beijing’s prestigious Peking University with bachelor’s and master’s degrees in finance, and now works at an investment firm. She said she’s exhausted from long hours at work.
“It’s embarrassing, but I’ll just say it,” she said in an interview from China’s capital. “I want to find a guy.” After a long pause, she added, “But it’s hard.”
China’s marriage rate steadily increased until hitting a peak in 2013, when 13.5 million marriages were recorded. By the end of that year, a precipitous decline began—one that continues. Last year the marriage rate hit half its 2013 level, at 6.8 million, according to China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs.
The factors complicating Liu’s romantic pursuits are manifold. Either she is drained of energy and pressed for time, or the potential suitor is. Her close relationship with her parents compels her to abide by one of their marriage demands: a spouse must own a home and ideally a car or other investments, or come from a rich family.
Both the causes and effects of the marriage falloff are being widely discussed in China. For one, the rising unemployment rate for the youth cohort has broken record after record each of the past few years.
Advertisement – Scroll to Continue
Joblessness for this group, aged 16 to 24, hit a record high of 21.3% in June. By comparison, the rate for the same age group in the U.S. was 7.5% in June, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
But while China’s number frightens many who are on the cusp of graduation, it may in fact be much higher.
Last week, a professor at Peking University, wrote in a leading financial magazine that her calculations show the rate could be as high as 46.5%. The online article by Professor Zhang Dandan, which has since been deleted, argued that some 16 million non-students in this range are likely “lying flat”—a popular Chinese expression meaning to have given up efforts to work.
Advertisement – Scroll to Continue
This sky-high jobless rate has given companies that employ younger workers—most notoriously tech firms—extreme leverage over their employees. If one wants a job at all, he or she may be forced to work the “996” schedule—9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week.
This leaves those who do choose the corporate life little time or energy for romantic pursuits. “No gym, no dates, no time for my own stuff,” said Lee Wang, a 30-year-old project manager at one of China’s leading gaming companies, which he asked not be named.
Amid these work conditions lies a vast property market that is both unstable and out of reach for an increasing number of Chinese. Many young men were caught up in the recent spate of defaults among China’s large developers, which left millions of already-purchased units unfinished, leaving the owners in limbo.
Advertisement – Scroll to Continue
A survey by university researchers taken just before the pandemic found that two-thirds of Chinese born after 1990 felt that owning a house was necessary for marriage.
The pressure for male suitors to own a property even has a phrase, the “mother-in-law economy”—meaning the requirement of the would-be bride’s mother that the future husband own a home.
A team of scholars from multiple Chinese business schools found that “the increasing price of houses, an important measure of marriage cost, has significantly reduced the marriage rate in China.”
Advertisement – Scroll to Continue
Using 20 years of data, they found that for every 1,000 yuan ($140) increase in property prices per square meter, the marriage rate falls by 0.3%. With housing prices in large Chinese cities rivaling those in the west, such price increases put significant dents in the marriage rate, according to the study.
“As housing prices continue to rise, many young people opt out of marriage because they cannot afford to buy a house,” said study author Zhou Hongyong.
So many Chinese have decided not to buy a home and remain unmarried that even if housing prices fall, the generational shift may have already cemented, a Chinese economist told local media in September.
Advertisement – Scroll to Continue
The government is in a difficult spot. It wants to boost the property market because rising prices means rising wealth for the hordes of Chinese who put their life savings in housing. But this would exacerbate the unattainability of purchasing property.
Ripples have also been felt in areas effected by the marriage rate, such as fertility. After a two-year lag, birthrates began to fall at roughly the same rate. China now faces a demographic crisis, with a shrinking population that will have too few workers to support a vast number of elderly citizens.
In 2001, China implemented legislation prohibiting unmarried women from any form of assisted reproductive technology (ART), including freezing one’s eggs. Women have pushed back against the law, by going overseas in droves to freeze their eggs and by challenging the legality of the legislation.
Last year, a Beijing court threw out a lawsuit from a women who said a hospital had refused to freeze her eggs because she was single. But officials may have taken notice. Other women have since filed suit.
In March, the National Health Commission began formally seeking expert opinion on allowing egg-freezing and other ART procedures, a step usually taken before legislation is introduced.
While foreign—particularly American ART companies—have benefited from this Chinese influx, a relaxation in the policy in China would mean a boon for the nascent fertility industry.
Experts that Barron’s spoke to were skeptical that the government, or the private sector, could easily intervene, or had the willingness to do so, to reduce work hours and pressure in hopes of improving marriage and fertility rates.
Not only are private companies reluctant to shrink working hours or take other employee-friendly measures because of cutthroat industry competitiveness, but firms could impede government from doing so, said Eli Friedman, chair of International and Comparative Labor at Cornell University who specializes in China.
“If the government were to require fewer working hours without a reduction in wages—which would be necessary for people to still afford living expenses in large cities—you would see tremendous pushback from companies, as it would undermine a key tenet of their business model,” he told Barron’s.
Zhenchao Qian, professor of sociology at Brown University, said that long hours in the private sector aren’t the primary reason for low fertility rates. Those who work in government or state sectors don’t necessarily work long hours but still marry late and have fewer children, he pointed out.
“It probably has more to do with the cost of raising children and poor job prospects even when children go to top tiered universities, that discourage marriage and fertility,” he said.
The government right now views economic development as more urgent than addressing the marriage and fertility problem, experts said. But policy makers still need to engage but tread lightly. “As a more effective approach, the government can contribute by addressing cultural attitudes toward marriage and family, modifying laws and regulations to influence the costs and benefits of having children,” said Haizheng Li, professor of economics at the Georgia Institute of Technology.
Write to editors@barrons.com
Big-time landlords have begun surrendering office buildings and other struggling properties to lenders this year, when just a few years ago they were fetching sky-high values amid super-low rates.
Many consider it the start of a reckoning for the estimated $20.7 trillion commercial real-estate market, likely its biggest test of confidence since the 2007-2008 global financial crisis.
Brian Lane, the Well Fargo Investment Institute’s lead analyst for private credit, pointed to a $1 trillion “wall of worry” as a wave of commercial real-estate loans come due through the end of 2024 (see chart), in a Monday client note. The balance balloons to about $2.5 trillion through the end of 2027.
“Property owners are facing higher vacancy, reduced net operating income, falling prices and rising capitalization rates,” Lane wrote. “While valuations have started to decline in most property types, there is likely more downside.”
A recent McKinsey report pegged prices for office buildings as likely to fall as much as 42%,
Morgan Stanley analysts reiterated a call for overall commercial-property prices to drop 27.4% peak-to-trough through the end of 2024.
Lane expects many borrowers to resort to private-capital providers for loans, with banks and the commercial mortgage-backed securities market pulling back.
“We expect that private investors will be needed to provide debt financing, and that sponsors may be forced to infuse equity to protect holdings and right-size property deals.”
Furthermore, institutional investors in bonds haven’t given up on all commercial real estate.
Saira Malik, Nuveen’s chief investment officer, said that “nonoffice” commercial mortgage-backed securities that currently offer 10.6% yields look attractive relative to the roughly 5.5% yield on investment-grade corporate bonds and 3.87% 10-year Treasury yield
TMUBMUSD10Y
,
in a Monday client note.
Despite regional-bank failures and ongoing challenges in the office sector, Malik pointed to climbing delinquency rates of about 2% on loans in bond deals as well below the 9% rate of the global financial crisis some 15 years ago.
She also said investors might consider commercial real estate for its higher yields and total returns, given a backdrop where the Federal Reserve is expected to soon end its most aggressive cycle of rate hikes in decades.
Read: Do Not Disturb: Tenants brace for more office landlords to go belly up on their property debts
Stocks rose on Monday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average
DJIA
up for its 11th straight session, ending at its highest level since February 2022, according to FactSet. The S&P 500 index
SPX
closed 5% below its record close on Jan. 3, 2022.
Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!
Consultations by electricity grid chiefs with local communities over planned major transmission infrastructure fall short of required standards, according to a leading property expert.
Landowners are being advised act to secure a fair hearing, and if eligible, compensation over a proposed multi-million-pound network upgrade affecting the Mearns district between Aberdeen and Dundee.
SSEN Transmission, Scottish & Southern Electricity Networks’ grid arm, is planning a 400kilovolt scheme to supply customers with renewable energy from onshore and large-scale offshore wind farms.
The East Coast 400kV Phase 2 project includes 65 miles of new overhead line between Kintore and Tealing via Fiddes, a 400kV substation at Tealing and overhead line ‘re-conductors’ between Alyth, Tealing and Westfield.
Affected residents gathered on Saturday night in Pitarrow, between Stonehaven and Forfar, to discuss their response to the proposals with Andrew Bowie, Minister for Nuclear and Networks and Conservative MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, Mairi Gougeon, Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands and MSP for Angus North and Mearns, and George Carr, an Aberdeenshire local councillor.
Also present at the meeting, organised by the Save our Mearns pressure group, was Ian Thornton-Kemsley of the property consultancy Galbraith.
The Mearns route reflects a major policy change from SSEN’s position in May 2020, when the energy network company said such a new line would have more environmental effects, be more costly to consumers and take longer than upgrading existing lines.
According to Mr Thornton-Kemsley, an expert on the property aspects of energy and utility projects. “There are unanswered questions about why SSEN has discarded other options and appears to be going for an entirely new line through unspoilt countryside.”
Major nationwide works are required to serve growing demand for electricity and enable the UK’s switch to renewable energy.
That involves shifting from networks designed to carry electricity from coal, gas and nuclear generators to systems that serve the growing number of wind and solar farms around the country.
It also means between 150,000 and 450,000 miles of additional transmission and distribution network across Britain, according to some sources.
National Grid said in March: “To meet the Government’s target of 50GW of offshore wind by 2030, our industry must deliver more than five times the amount of transmission infrastructure in the next seven years, than has been built in the past 30 years.”
“Each of the tree alternatives route proposed by SSEN from Fiddes to Forfar runs through predominantly prime agricultural land – a category occupying only 8 per cent of Scotland,” said Mr Thornton-Kemsley.
The plans involve vehicles travelling a 39-mile stretch, potentially risking the spread of pathogens such as Potato Cyst Nematode (PCN) and Clubroot in a key area for seed potatoes as well as daffodils and oilseed rape.
In the past 10 years PCN-infected land has risen by 30 per cent and unchecked, any continuation could fatally damage the Scottish seed potato industry.
“SSEN’s contractors have demonstrated during surveys for this project they cannot follow their own biosecurity protocols – have we any faith they will follow the sort of biosecurity essential to protect agriculture in a project such as this? I think not,” said Mr Thornton-Kemsley of Galbraith, who is instructed to represent a number of affected parties along the route.
Further, though the risk of exposure to magnetic fields and ill health is considered low, public perceptions may affect the marketability and future value of the property, so that houses close to pylon lines may be significantly devalued.
“SSEN has yet to explain how it will fulfil its duty to mitigate any adverse effects its proposals may have on properties and natural beauty, and it is difficult to see how this is possible without the loss of further prime agricultural land,” said Mr Thornton-Kemsley.
“In my opinion the company’s consultation to date, and the way it has gone about it, fall far short.
“Anyone affected by these changes should talk to us.”
Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.
Edmond, Oklahoma — The Commercial Real Estate Summit Foundation™ is hosting their ninth annual statewide Commercial Real Estate Summit™ on Wednesday, Oct. 11, 2023 at the University of Central Oklahoma Nigh Center Grand Ballroom & Conference rooms.
The CRE Summit™ will be hosting a breakfast & lunch keynote speaker with various educational tracks throughout the day.
The CRE Summit Foundation is again partnering with Dr. David Chapman, Associate Professor of Real Estate at UCO, and the UCO Real Estate Program to benefit the UCO Real Estate Foundation Scholarship Fund.
UCO is the state’s only university level academic program in the real estate industry.
The Summit includes continuing education tracks for various morning and afternoon session hot topics, panel discussions and speakers from within the commercial real estate industry as well as the Pivot Awards™ presentation.
‘Hot topics’ zg the 2023 Summit
Planning & Development Track, Session Title: Updating The Oklahoma Housing Needs Assessment
The Oklahoma statewide housing needs assessment was last updated in 2015.
The OU Gibb College of Architecture is in the process of updating the statewide housing needs assessment.
This information is critical for developers planning new developments.
Learn about the progress of the Oklahoma Housing Needs Assessment.
The assessment will be an important tool for determining housing costs, demand, and supply, for policy creation and market analysis.
Shane Hampton, Director of the OU Institute for Quality Communities and Shawn Michael Schaefer, Director of the University of Oklahoma Urban Design Studio and Associate Professor, both at the Gibbs College of Architecture will be the speakers during the session.
Visit www.cresummit.org to learn more or keep an eye out for updates to our 2023 event schedule.
Registration to attend the Summit is now open with tickets starting at $99 students (any college or university/student ID required), $175 for general admission, $199 at the door.
Register for the Summit at: https://2023cresummit.eventbrite.com/
Note: For more information, such as sponsoring the Summit, visit www.cresummit.org. Pat McGuigan of The City Sentinel prepared this story for online posting, working with a press release from the Commercial Real Estate Summit Foundation™.
Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!
A property agents in Inverness has thanked everyone who got involved in its food bank donation collection.
The Highland Solicitors Property Centre (HSPC) collected food donations at their city centre office to give to Inverness Foodstuff.
It worked on the effort with Agent Giving, an initiative that supports estate agents to fund raise for charitable causes.
Bernadette Walker, HSPC manager, said: “We have had so much support from our member firms. They have been really supportive and we have had some big collections from everyone, which is great. We are just so glad we have been able to pull it all together.”
The firm received an abundance of pasta donations in particular, as well as pet food, among many other donations.
Although the collection has officially finished any further donations will still be gratefully received by the office based in Queensgate, particularly any men’s toiletries.
Ms Walker added: “Thank you for our member firms and everyone who got involved.”
City asked to reconsider role in commercial developments
Recently, I responded to the City of Flagstaff (COF) appeal to residents regarding current budgeting priorities and objectives. Earlier this year I had the opportunity to attend the City of Flagstaff’s budgeting retreats. Over multiple days, I learnt a great deal regarding the anticipated spending on operations and capital projects for fiscal year 2023-2024. The days were filled with charts, tables and diagrams.
At the end of one day, a COF staff member presented the refurbishing and rebuilding of a commercial property owned by the COF. The property is located before the entrance to Buffalo Park and it is primarily leased to the USGS. He proceeded to tell the budget meeting attendees, City Council and City Staff primarily, that a new investment in the USGS buildings would cost over $50 million. This amount was higher than prior year estimate of over $35 million! But not to worry, USFS and the COF were close to agreeing to a five-year lease with a five-year renewal! Not one question from the audience! Not a peep! Not a graph, table or diagram! I was stunned! I do not believe any commercial developer would spend over $50 million with a potential five- or 10-year lease in the future.
Developing commercial property is NO WHERE to be found in the Flagstaff Key Community Priorities and Objectives used in the COF budgeting. The COF mission does not mention the COF developing commercial property.
If the COF remains in commercial building business, this presents numerous conflicts of interest for the COF. This situation today is like having the fox guarding the hen house given the COF enforces and creates the building codes!
The COF should divest all commercial property; the residents tax dollars can be better spent on actual COF’s Priorities and Objectives.
Source link