Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
On
“Company”) investment in a student housing complex,
a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“ARF”) entered into guaranties
related to a
the Company has a membership interest. Pursuant to the Guaranty Agreement, dated
as of
the “Guarantors”) for the benefit of
“Lender”), the Guarantors provided limited (“bad boy”) guaranties to the Lender
pursuant to the
Drive East, LLC
Lender (“Loan Agreement”) until the earlier of the payment in full of the
indebtedness or the date of a sale of the property pursuant to a foreclosure of
the mortgage or deed or other transfer in lieu of foreclosure is accepted by the
Lender.
On
Agreement for the benefit of the Lender to guaranty the timely completion of the
project in accordance with the Loan Agreement, as well as a Carry Guaranty
Agreement, for the benefit of the Lender to guaranty the prompt and
unconditional payment by Borrower of all customary or necessary costs and
expenses incurred in connection with the operation, maintenance and management
of the property and an Environmental Indemnity Agreement jointly and severally
in favor of the Lender whereby the Guarantors serving as Indemnitors provided
environmental representations and warranties, covenants and indemnification
(collectively the “Guaranties”). The Guaranties include certain financial
covenants required of ARF, including required net worth and liquidity
requirements.
The foregoing description of the Guaranty Agreement, the Completion Guaranty
Agreement, the Carry Guaranty Agreement and the Environmental Indemnity
Agreement are only summaries, do not purport to be complete and are qualified in
their entirety by reference to the full text of such agreements, which are filed
as Exhibits 10.1, 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 hereto and are incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits.
Exhibit No. 10.1 Guaranty Agreement executedJanuary 24, 2023 byJason Pollack ,Frank Dellaglio andACRES Realty Funding, Inc. for the benefit ofOceanview Life and Annuity Company 10.2 Completion Guaranty Agreement executedJanuary 24, 2023 byJason Pollack ,Frank Dellaglio andACRES Realty Funding, Inc. for the benefit ofOceanview Life and Annuity Company 10.3 Carry Guaranty Agreement executedJanuary 24, 2023 byJason Pollack ,Frank Dellaglio andACRES Realty Funding, Inc. for the benefit ofOceanview Life and Annuity Company 10.4 Environmental Indemnity Agreement executedJanuary 24, 2023 byJason Pollack ,Frank Dellaglio andACRES Realty Funding, Inc. in favor ofOceanview Life and Annuity Company 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document).
——————————————————————————–
© Edgar Online, source
After recording a gloriously bulling realty market in 2022, there is an all-round conviction that 2023 will not be very different, but for a little tempering on the office space leasing front. Stakeholders cite a renewed sense of ownership amongst consumers post the Covid-19 pandemic, increased confidence tied to income security & growth and strong macro fundamentals at home.
Realtor Kishore Reddy, CMD, MANA Project Pvt Ltd, highlights, “Recessionary fears in developed economies have prompted investors to choose the real estate sector as it seems to be the only industry immune to the current economic slump.”
Data from online brokerage firm PropTiger.com show record new housing sales in 2022 at 3,08,940 units, up 50% from 2,05,940 units, the year before, in select top eight cities in India. Saransh Trehan, managing director of another realty developer, Trehan Group, expects this demand to sustain in 2023, driven mainly by end-users, despite rising home loan interest rates.
Murali M, CMD, Shriram Properties Ltd sees housing demand percolating to tier 2 and tier 3 cities that are closer to large metros or located in industrial belts with investment potential.
A recent consumer sentiment survey by Anarock, a real estate consultancy and services enterprise, indicates that if home loan interest rates rise above the 9.5%-mark, housing demand contraction is likely. “I expect an overall increase of 10% (in pricing) in FY23, a trend which is likely to continue over the next two years,” Shriram’s Murali M cautioned.
Office leasing in India’s top seven cities rose 46% over previous year, to nearly 39 million square feet (msf) in 2022, according to a recent report by property consultancy Jones Lang LaSalle, India. “Currently, 70% of offices in this country are occupied by foreign companies,” pointed out Arun Puri, chairman of Anarock Group, warning that a recession in the US in 2023 will slow down MNC (multinational companies) leasing in India.
A quick recap
Despite global tailwinds, Indian realty saw much cheer in 2022.
Property prices in the residential segment appreciated by an average of 4 – 8% on the back of increase in construction cost, admitted Vivek Rathi, director for research at the property consultancy firm, Knight Frank India. A cumulative interest rate hike of 225 basis points by the Reserve Bank, since May, exerted additional pressure. Yet, demand remained robust riding on upbeat consumer sentiments.
Moving away from location-specific demands, property buyers demonstrated inclination towards functional homes, with added amenities. “Bigger homes, independent floors and plots were the main sought-after or preferred options of home buyers during the year 2022,” Trehan added.
Commercial realty: A worthy runner-up
The commercial arm of the sector registered a satisfactory performance on the back of strong demand till September 2022. The last quarter of the calendar year saw lukewarm demand influenced by recessionary fears in developed economies. “The last quarter of 2022 was marked by increasing caution and reticence by MNC occupiers,” explained Puri.
While the segment failed to surpass the 47 msf – mark achieved in 2019, Thirumal Govindraj, who is a senior managing director at RMZ Corp, a realty developer focussed on commercial space, called it a healthy performance in the light of a continued hybrid work model in many companies.
The percentage of employees working from home has risen from 2019 levels and companies are demanding increased flexibility in terms of office designs and layouts to suit scaling requirements, he added.
Foreign direct investment into the sector, which accounts for a majority of funding into the industry, failed to keep up with 2021 levels. At $5.1 billion, it was down 15% from the year before, Rathi stressed.
State of affordability
A study of top eight cities in the country, by Knight Frank India, pointed to declining affordability levels in Indian markets in 2022, on a year-on-year basis, triggered by increasing home-loan rates. Affordability levels, however, remain significantly better than the pre-pandemic levels in 2019. Ahmedabad emerged as the most affordable housing market in the country, followed by Kolkata and Pune.
For years, real estate companies and developers used websites to attract potential customers — their own, or platforms that provide property listings. But physical site visits were an integral part of the selling process. This started changing a few years ago, with some developers offering online tours of their projects.
The pandemic sped up this adoption of technology — and companies now offer a lot more: from virtual tours to interactive, immersive virtual reality experiences, to extended reality simulations, they give aspiring home owners a sneak peek into what living in the finished project will actually feel like.
Rashmi Kohli, Director of Sparrow Interactive said, “Technology which was used only for backward integration now has taken a front seat in forward facilitating the brands. Real estate brands globally want to create memorable experiences for their prospect so that in this cloud of offerings they are able to stand out.”
Consultancy firm Anarock says globally, conversion rates have risen to 40 percent — and much of this surge can be attributed directly to the use of new-age tech as selling tools. Of course, this also means a jump in sales and revenues.
Mandhir Vinaik, AVP of Residential Sales at Anarock said, “Earlier, they would take six months to buy a property by understanding things but with technology in place, that duration of buying cycle has reduced because you have a lot of clarity, and that is even happening at the local sites.”
It also gives the builder a cost advantage in the long term, even if the technology is costly to begin with.
“The buyer can experience the entire sample house without actually being constructed by the developer. So that that saves on the money, time and resources,” Vinaik added.
It’s not just high-end luxury projects that are adopting such technology. Anarock says that mid-range and affordable housing projects account for 56 percent of new launches in the third quarter of 2022 — and a lot of the buyers are millennial’s with whom such technology resonates. But experts say that technology is constantly evolving… and expensive. So adoption has been relatively slow.
Hemanth Velury, CEO of VirtSpaces said, “What we have seen specific to India is, real estate is a family owned business, it is the second or third generation that has gone abroad, and these are the people pushing efficiencies everywhere. Not just back office or financial efficiencies but sales efficiency as well, so that is where virtual reality really helps. I have been pleasantly surprised that tier II cities are actually more acceptable to trying out technologies than tier I cities.”
This new trend has opened up a whole new market for startups in India.
Technology, for real estate developers, is no longer about hiring a website developer. It’s now about immersive experiences and holograms — stuff that lets a potential buyer walk around in a home that’s still under construction miles away, and play around with the interiors to get a real feel for the space.
This has created a whole new high-growth sector… and while the startup ecosystem in India has been complaining of a funding winter, proptech enterprises have seen private investment jump 55 percent between 2009 and 2021.
CRISIL expects primary residential sales to post modest volume growth of 3-8 per cent on-year in 2022-23 (FY23) on a high base of the previous year for the top eight cities.
The increase in primary residential sales will be despite a reversal in the purchasing power of homebuyers.
Affordability has taken a hit in FY23 owing to an uptick in interest rates and capital values, and a reversal of stamp duty cut across key states. The demand momentum has sustained despite a rise of 6-10 per cent on-year in capital values across cities, following a steep increase in raw material cost.
In the case of Mumbai, property registrations (including that of resale properties) more than doubled on-year between April and November, albeit on a low base, while overall registration in the rest of Maharashtra increased 16 per cent on-year over the period.
Sales for large builders were even better.
In the first half of the current financial year, six key listed developers registered a sharp 70 per cent on-year rise in sales booked (on a volume basis), with new launches nearly doubling on-year, albeit on a low base of last year when the volume was affected following the second wave of Covid-19.
In 2023-24 (FY24), demand is expected to rise further on-year; sales are projected to print a higher 5-9 per cent compound annual growth rate for all cities over the next two financial years, except the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR).
Demand in MMR is already on a high base, and the removal of stamp duty benefits, as well as the imposition of an additional stamp duty of 1 per cent (metro cess starting April 2022), have partially restricted incremental demand. But the Maharashtra government’s recent announcement on the extension of stamp duty waiver to three years in case of a resale property could see some traction from investors. Also buoying demand will be a significant improvement in infrastructure and connectivity expected across MMR in the near term.
In contrast, sales in the National Capital Region are expected to see relatively higher on-year growth of 7-8 per cent vis-à-vis MMR at 0-2 per cent in FY23 and FY24 because of policy push and overall improvement in the regulatory environment, which has increased consumer confidence in the region’s property market.
In the case of Bengaluru and Hyderabad, incremental demand will primarily be from those employed in the information technology (IT)/IT-enabled services, banking, financial services, and insurance sectors as salaries of employees in these sectors continue to grow steadily.
On the launch front, following a plunge in 2020-21 (FY21), there was only a moderate rise in 2021-22 (FY22) as developers largely focused on completion rather than commencing new projects. Also, a majority of the launches over the past two financial years were contributed by organised developers instead of mid- and small developers. The share of key six listed developers rose to 50-60 per cent of overall launches in the past two financial years, from sub-40 per cent, with the trend likely to continue.
Launches are forecast to continue to gradually increase in FY23 and FY24, reaching the pre-pandemic level of Rs 200 million square feet (msf) annually.
Also, completions are gaining momentum. After a drop in FY21 owing to the unavailability of labour and raw materials that deterred construction activity, completions are expected to be upwards of 450 msf in FY23. But, thereafter, as the situation normalises, completions are forecast to maintain a steady momentum of 300-310 msf annually up to FY24.
On the commercial real estate front, after a healthy performance in the first half of this financial year, net leasing will slow down in the second half owing to fears of an impending global recession, leading to an estimated lower double-digit growth rate for FY23. In FY24, though, net leasing is forecast to pick up gradually, which will translate into up to a 100-basis point improvement in occupancy.
While leasing demand will be lower than expected, the credit profile of players rated by CRISIL Ratings is likely to remain stable. The ratio of debt-to-earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortisation, which indicates leverage, will remain comfortable at 4.4x in FY24 vis-à-vis 4.6x in FY23. And while the cost of debt has been inching up, debt service coverage is expected to also remain healthy at 1.7-1.8x in FY23 and the next.
Consequently, the leverage and credit profiles of real estate developers, which had strengthened following recovery in FY22, should sustain over the medium term.
Our sample set of 11 large and listed developers have also benefited from the strengthening of capital structures through equity raise and monetisation of assets of Rs 18,000 crore over the past two financial years, which have helped them navigate the peak of the pandemic. That, along with strong sales momentum, will improve their debt-to-total assets ratio (a measure for leverage) significantly to 23 per cent by March 2023 and 21 per cent by March 2024, from 42 per cent at the start of the pandemic.
The upbeat forecast will not be restricted only to large developers. Some mid-sized developers that have historically maintained low leverage are expected to sustain their credit profiles as well. However, leveraged developers with debt-to-total assets above 50 per cent may struggle owing to weak liquidity and limited ability to raise equity and monetise commercial assets.
After two years of shutdowns and social distancing, 2022 was a year to rebuild.
The Minnesota Square Park pavilion lit up for the late shows at the first Minnesota Original Music Festival in St. Peter. (Philip Weyhe/southernminn.com)
Sheriff David Lange (left) Marc Chadderdon (right)
Susan Akland, Jeff Brand
The Smallest Cog Bicycle Shop owner Mark Plotz repairs a bike in his shop. The bike’s owner is a client from St. Paul who traveled all the way down to St. Peter when the business moved to St. Peter so that Plotz could take a look at it. (Carson Hughes/southernminn.com)
Real estate agent Amber Seaver of Keller Williams Preferred Realty, center, cuts the ribbon to debut her new home office in St. Peter. (Carson Hughes/southernminn.com)
Mother and daughter duo Cheryl Klages (left) and Alaena Klages (right) have stayed busy renovating the old Govenaires Thrift Store building into a new boutique storefront, Alteliér Creative. The store, set to open April 2, focuses on locally sourced and sustainable fashion, jewelry, artwork and more. (Carson Hughes/southernminn.com)
Allison Ellingson opened The People’s Store in downtown St. Peter this month. The store features her own handmade textiles and ethically sourced home goods. (Carson Hughes/southernminn.com)
Brittany Brown owns and operates Healing Harvest, a new cannabis shop in St. Peter, with her wife Jennifer. (Carson Hughes photos/southernminn.com)
Emily Schoper (left) and Ashley McGowan (right) debuted Säga Beauty Collective in St. Peter this fall. The business acts as both an extension of Frey Salon’s services and an independent business focused on high-end cosmetic services. (Carson Hughes/southernminn.com)
Kwik Trip and Clark Gas drove record low gas prices in St. Peter. According to GasBuddy, the $2.39 per gallon prices were the lowest in the state of Minnesota in mid-December. (File photo/southernminn.com)
The city of St. Peter approved a loan to Paddlefish Brewing Company, which intends to open in Nicollet Plaza next year. (Carson Hughes/southernminn.com)
Edward Jones Financial Advisor Bart Weelborg is developing a new commercial space near Hallett’s Pond which will house his new office and two or three other businesses. (Carson Hughes/southernminn.com)
Gathered officials toss dirt to close the groundbreaking ceremony. (Ben Camp/Southernminn.com)
Carol Olson (left) is retiring from her post as DHS Forensic Services Executive Director as Soniya Hirachan (right) takes the reigns.
The Power Up Clubhouse, soon to be known as Lighthouse on Marshall, is able to see more clients and offer a greater range of services and activities at its new location on 1301 Marshall in St. Peter. (Carson Hughes/southernminn.com)
Bob Vogel, owner of Stained Glass Studio, shows his glassworks to 6-year-old Ben Borslein and 8-year-old Charlotte Borslein. (Carson Hughes/southernminn.com)
A surge in post-pandemic pent-up demand helped India’s property market overcome risks from rising interest rates this year but the dream run might face hurdles from global headwinds in 2023.
Any moderation in growth will mark a premature end to what industry watchers believe to be the start of a ‘long-term upcycle’ in the Indian real estate sector.
The optimism emanates from record housing sales this year, surpassing the pre-Covid 2019 numbers and the previous high of 2014.
“2022 proved to be a successful year for the residential real-estate market as momentum of sales and consolidation of players continued,” property consultant Anarock’s Chairman Anuj Puri said.
Fundamentally, the market is much more mature and stable than it was prior to the pandemic, he told PTI.
Puri added that he is “hoping that 2023 calendar year is as vibrant as 2022 for the residential market, provided the headwinds of possible global recession, high inflation and interest rates and Covid resurgence doesn’t become a spoilsport.”
Realtors’ apex body Credai’s President Harsh Vardhan Patodia said, he expects “strong and positive momentum to prevail in the Indian real estate market.”
The International Monetary Fund has projected the global economy to shrink by 0.2% in 2023. This would mean investment flows to developing economies from rich nations will slow. Many emerging markets and low-income countries are already facing pressures from a depreciating currency, capital outflows and inflation.
With the inflation battle yet to be won, economists expect the Reserve Bank of India to raise interest rates further at least in the first half of next year.
According to Anarock, 2022 housing sales in primary markets (fresh sales) across seven major cities stood at nearly 3.65 lakh units, an all-time high, up 54% from 2,36,500 units last year.
Sales of residential properties stood at 2,61,360 units in 2019 (pre-Covid) and 3,42,980 units in 2014 across seven cities — Delhi-NCR, Mumbai Metropolitan Region, Chennai, Kolkata, Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Pune.
The demand growth was secular and broad-based in nature, as sales increased across all price points, from low-cost homes to luxury villas, undeterred by hardening of interest rates on home loans as well as property prices.
Home loan rates have gone up since May this year from a decade-low of around 6.5%.
Resurgence in demand coupled with rise in input costs, prompted real estate developers, who were working on a very thin margin from the last several years, to increase their selling prices.
Housing prices, which remained stagnant for the last several years, saw a modest appreciation of an average of 4-7% across these top seven cities.
There was a sharp increase in prices of key raw materials like cement and steel in the first half of this year because of geopolitical concerns amid the war between Russia and Ukraine. Prices of steel have eased now but many other commodities remain costlier.
The residential real estate market saw further consolidation this year in both demand and supply towards branded and trusted developers. Real estate projects from reputed corporate houses like Tata, Mahindra, Godrej, Piramal Group and Adani gained further traction.
Almost all listed realty firms reported a sharp rise in their annual sales bookings in every quarter this year, encouraging them to aggressively expand their land bank for future development through outright land purchases and partnerships with landowners.
Bengaluru-based Prestige Group, Mumbai-based Macrotech Developers (Lodha Group), Godrej Properties and DLF are in the race to become the top listed entity in terms of sales bookings this fiscal year.
Struggle for unbranded players, lacking credibility, further exacerbated. Many of those realty firms became bankrupt as well and went into insolvency proceedings. The resolution of debt-laden Jaypee Infratech did not see light of the day even this year.
Like the housing segment, the other verticals of Indian real estate — office, malls, co-working, co-living and industrial & warehousing spaces — witnessed a strong revival.
As per property consultancy JLL India data, net absorption or leasing of office space rose 46% to 38.25 million square feet this year from 26.2 million square feet in 2021. The net leasing, however, could not reach the pre-Covid level of record 47 million square feet in 2019.
The gross leasing of office space, as per property consultancy Colliers India data, is likely to rise 52% to 50.1 million square feet in 2022 across six major cities as demand from corporates rose. Large enterprises also actively took office space in co-working centres as part of their strategy to save on capital expenditure and adopt flexibility.
However, the gross absorption of office space may fall to 35-38 million square feet as corporates, both foreign and domestic, have become cautious in expanding business amid global headwinds.
In the co-living segment, the operators heaved a sigh of relief with the opening of offices and educational institutions after Covid cases receded sharply earlier this year.
To make up for the loss of business in the last two years, the co-living operators are expanding their operations aggressively.
Meanwhile, this year saw a 17% drop in private equity investment in real estate to $5.13 billion as investors turned cautious amid geopolitical and inflationary concerns. The real estate sector saw many big deals, especially in the office and warehousing segment.
In 2022, builders had a reason to smile as the real estate sector remained strong after overcoming a plethora of disruptions during the past six years in the form of demonetisation, implementation of RERA and GST, NBFC crisis and the pandemic.
The domestic realty sector, which is projected to be worth $1 trillion by 2030, is the second biggest employer after agriculture and supports around 200 other industries.
Builders are confident of not only repeating their performance but bettering it, if the pandemic and inflation remain under control in the country.
“The sustained home buying demand buoyancy may dip if interest rates cross the upper tolerance limit of 9.5%, leading to demand contractions,” Niranjan Hiranandani, National Vice Chairman of realtors apex body NAREDCO, said.
The company said in a statement that it has given exit to ASK Property Fund by paying off the debt of Rs 125 crores.
Gulshan Group took the loan from ASK Property Fund in September 2020 for its mixed-use project ‘Gulshan One29’ located near Noida Expressway, in Sector 129.
With the loan closure, ASK Property Fund has achieved an internal rate of return (IRR) of 21 per cent.
“Covid time was challenging, but the ASK team has an excellent understanding of the Noida market, which was reflected in their approach to investment. The patient capital with a focus on completion helped us through the most difficult period. I am optimistic that we will have many more possibilities to collaborate,” said Deepak Kapoor Director of Gulshan Group.
The project ‘Gulshan One29’ is an ultra-modern commercial complex and is strategically located close to IT Parks, and high-end residential and commercial zones. The project consists of retail, commercial spaces and a multiplex spread across 4,37,190 square feet.
Gulshan Group is one of the leading real estate developers in the NCR. It has developed many luxury residential projects and has forayed into the commercial real estate sector with its mixed-use project.
ASK Property Fund is the real estate private equity arm of the ASK Group.
Amit Bhagat, CEO & MD, ASK Property Fund said, “We realised the counter cyclical opportunity in the market for investment in 2020 and accelerated our efforts for identifying opportunities. Noida has been a preferred market for us since 2010 since it has a strong job corridor and is supported by good physical and social infrastructure.”
The fund is in the midst of finalising a few more investments and are prepared for accelerated deployment with a robust pipeline, he added.
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO GUARANTEE AGREEMENT
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO GUARANTEE AGREEMENT, dated as of November 17, 2022 (this “Amendment”), between ACRES COMMERCIAL REALTY CORP, f/k/a Exantas Capital Corp., a Maryland corporation (“Guarantor”), and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association (“Buyer”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Repurchase Agreement (as defined below).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, RCC REAL ESTATE SPE 8, LLC (“Seller”) and Buyer are parties to that certain Uncommitted Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2018 (as amended by that certain First Amendment to Uncommitted Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2020, as further amended by that certain Amendment No. 2 to Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2021, as further amended by that certain Amendment No. 3 to Master Repurchase Agreement and Guarantee Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2021, as further amended by that certain Term SOFR Conforming Changes Amendment, dated as of December 31, 2021, as amended hereby, and as may be further amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “Repurchase Agreement”);
WHEREAS, in connection with the Repurchase Agreement, Guarantor entered into that certain Guarantee Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2018 (as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Guarantee Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2020, as further amended by that certain Amendment No. 2 to Guarantee Agreement, dated as October 2, 2020, as further amended by that certain Amendment No. 3 to Master Repurchase Agreement and Guarantee Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2021, as amended hereby, and as may be further amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “Guarantee Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, Guarantor and Buyer have agreed to amend certain provisions of the Guarantee Agreement in the manner set forth herein.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Guarantor and Buyer agree as follows:
Section 1.Amendments to Guarantee Agreement.
(a)Section 1 of the Guarantee Agreement is hereby amended by amending and restating the following defined term in its entirety to read as follows:
“”Interest Expense” shall mean, with respect to Guarantor and its Consolidated Subsidiaries and any period, determined without duplication on a consolidated basis, the amount of total interest expense incurred by Guarantor and its Consolidated Subsidiaries, including capitalized or accruing interest(but excluding
(i) any accrued interest on REO construction loans where interest is reserved with the construction loan lender or the accrued or capitalized interest is not required to be recognized as interest expense under GAAP, (ii) the excess amortization of issuance costs of securitization of assets, to the extent such amortization is accelerated due to (a) early payoffs of any underlying assets in the CRE Securitizations or (b) issuer electing to early terminate the securities, and the non-cash interest expense associated with convertible notes; (iii) the non-cash interest expense associated with Senior Unsecured Notes non-market discount, Convertible Debt and similar debt obligations with equity conversion or option features; (iv) non-cash amortization from terminated interest rate swaps or (v) termination costs from the early retirement of indebtedness), plus Guarantor and its Consolidated Subsidiaries’ proportionate share of interest expense from the joint venture investments in unconsolidated Affiliates of Guarantor and its Consolidated Subsidiaries, all with respect to such period.”
(b)Section 1 of the Guarantee Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following defined term to read as follows:
“”REO” shall mean real estate property owned by Borrower whether owned pursuant to an equity investment or mortgage foreclosure.”
(c)Section 9(a)(i) of the Guarantee Agreement is hereby amended by amending and restating that section in its entirety to read as follows:
“(i)At all times, Guarantor shall maintain unpledged, unencumbered Liquidity of (1) from the Closing Date through October 25, 2021, not less than the greater of (A) $10,000,000 and (B) ten percent (10%) of the aggregate outstanding Repurchase Price of all Purchased Assets as of such time; (2) from October 26, 2021 through September 30, 2022, not less than the greater of (A) $10,000,000 and (B) five percent (5%) of the aggregate outstanding Repurchase Price of all Purchased Assets as of such time; (3) from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023, not less than the greater of (A) $15,000,000 and (B) seven and a half percent(7.5%) of the aggregate outstanding Repurchase Price of all Purchased Assets as of such time; and (4) from and after October 1, 2023, not less than the greater of (A) $10,000,000 and (B) five percent (5%) of the aggregate outstanding Repurchase Price of all Purchased Assets as of such time.”
(d)Section 9(a)(iii) of the Guarantee Agreement is hereby amended by amending and restating that section in its entirety to read as follows:
“(iii)Guarantor shall not permit, for any Test Period, the ratio of its Total Indebtedness to its Total Equity to be (1) from the Closing Date through the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2022, greater than 6.00 to 1.00; (2) from calendar quarter ending December 31, 2022 through the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2023, greater than 5.50 to 1.00; and (3) at all times after the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2023, greater than 6.00 to 1.00. For the avoidance of
-2-
doubt, any calculation of Total Indebtedness will include any and all recourse and non-recourse debt of any Consolidated Subsidiary of Guarantor.”
(e)Section 9(a)(v) of the Guarantee Agreement is hereby amended by amending and restating that section in its entirety to read as follows:
“(v)Guarantor shall not permit, for any Test Period, the ratio of (i) the sum of the trailing four (4) fiscal quarters EBITDA for Guarantor and its Consolidated Subsidiaries for such Test Period to (ii) the trailing four (4) fiscal quarters Interest Expense for Guarantor and its Consolidated Subsidiaries for such Test Period to be (1) from the Closing Date through the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2022, less than 1.50 to 1.00; (2) from the calendar quarter ending December 31, 2022 through the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2023, less than 1.25 to 1.00; and at all times after the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2023, less than 1.50 to 1.00.”
Section 2.Conditions Precedent; Effective Date. This Amendment shall become effective on the date on which this Amendment is executed and delivered by a duly authorized officer of each of Buyer and Guarantor (the “Amendment Effective Date”).
Section 3.Guarantor’s Representations and Warranties. On and as of the Amendment Effective Date, and after giving effect to the matters contained in this Amendment, Guarantor hereby represents and warrants to Buyer that (a) it is in compliance with all the terms and provisions set forth in the Guarantee Agreement on its part to be observed or performed, (b) with respect to Guarantor’s covenants in Section 9(a)(i), 9(a)(iii) and 9(a)(v) of the Guarantee, after giving effect to this Amendment and, with respect to all other requirements of the Transaction Documents, both prior to and after giving effect to this Amendment, no Default or Event of Default under the Repurchase Agreement has occurred and is continuing, and (c) it has no, and hereby waives all, defenses, rights of setoff, claims, counterclaims or causes of action of any kind or description against Buyer arising under or in respect of the Guarantee Agreement or any other Transaction Document (other than a defense of payment or performance). Guarantor hereby confirms and reaffirms the representations and warranties contained in the Guarantee Agreement and all of the other Transaction Documents.
Section 4.Acknowledgments of Guarantor. Guarantor hereby acknowledges and agrees that (a) it continues to be bound by the Guarantee Agreement to the extent of the Obligations (as defined therein), and (b) as of the date hereof, Buyer is in compliance with its undertakings and obligations under the Repurchase Agreement, the Guarantee Agreement and each of the other Transaction Documents.
Section 5.Limited Effect. The Guarantee Agreement (except as the foregoing is expressly amended and modified by this Amendment), and each of the other Transaction Documents remain, in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms; provided, however, that on the Amendment Effective Date, (a) all references in the Repurchase Agreement to the “Transaction Documents” shall be deemed to include, in any event, this Amendment, and (b) each reference to the “Guarantee” or “Guarantee Agreement” in any of the
-3-
Transaction Documents shall be deemed to be a reference to the Guarantee Agreement, as amended hereby.
Section 6.Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument, and the words “executed,” signed,” “signature,” and words of like import as used above and elsewhere in this Amendment or in any other certificate, agreement or document related to this transaction shall include, in addition to manually executed signatures, images of manually executed signatures transmitted by facsimile or other electronic format (including, without limitation, “pdf”, “tif” or “jpg”) and other electronic signatures (including, without limitation, any electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record). The use of electronic signatures and electronic records (including, without limitation, any contract or other record created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored by electronic means) shall be of the same legal effect, validity and enforceability as a manually executed signature or use of a paper-based record-keeping system to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, including the Federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, the New York State Electronic Signatures and Records Act and any other applicable law, including, without limitation, any state law based on the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or the Uniform Commercial Code.
Section 7.Costs and Expenses. Guarantor shall pay Buyer’s reasonable actual out of pocket costs and expenses, including reasonable fees and expenses of attorneys, incurred in connection with the preparation, negotiation, execution and consummation of this Amendment.
Section 8.No Novation, Effect of Agreement. Guarantor and Buyer have entered into this Amendment solely to amend the terms of the Guarantee Agreement and do not intend this Amendment or the transactions contemplated hereby to be, and this Amendment and the transactions contemplated hereby shall not be construed to be, a novation of any of the obligations of Guarantor under or in connection with the Guarantee Agreement.
Section 9.Submission to Jurisdiction. Each party hereto irrevocably and unconditionally (i) submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of any United States Federal or New York State court sitting in Manhattan, and any appellate court from any such court, solely for the purpose of any suit, action or proceeding brought to enforce its obligations under this Amendment or relating in any way to this Amendment and (ii) waives, to the fullest extent it may effectively do so, any defense of an inconvenient forum to the maintenance of such action or proceeding in any such court and any right of jurisdiction on account of its place of residence or domicile.
The parties hereto hereby irrevocably consent to the service of any summons and complaint and any other process by the mailing of copies of such process to them at their respective address specified in the Guarantee Agreement. The parties hereto hereby agree that a final judgment in any such action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by law. Nothing in this Section 9 shall affect the right of Buyer to serve legal process in any other manner permitted by
-4-
law or affect the right of Buyer to bring any action or proceeding against Guarantor or its property in the courts of other jurisdictions.
Section 10.WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ALL RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AMENDMENT.
Section 11.GOVERNING LAW. THIS AMENDMENT AND ANY CLAIM, CONTROVERSY OR DISPUTE ARISING UNDER OR RELATED TO THIS AMENDMENT, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES TO THIS AMENDMENT, AND/OR THE INTERPRETATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF THE PARTIES TO THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL LAWS AND DECISIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CHOICE OF LAW RULES THEREOF. THE PARTIES HERETO INTEND THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5-1401 OF THE NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW SHALL APPLY TO THIS AMENDMENT.
[SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW]
-5-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written and effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.
ACRES COMMERCIAL REALTY CORP, f/k/a Exantas Capital Corp., a Maryland corporation |
|||
By: |
/s/ Mark Fogel |
||
Name: |
Mark Fogel |
||
Title: |
President and CEO |
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association |
|||
By: |
/s/ Thomas N. Cassino |
||
Name: |
Thomas N. Cassino |
||
Title: |
Managing Director |
Item 8.01 Other Events.
On
into Amendment No. 4 to Guarantee Agreement (the “JPM Amendment”) with
Chase Bank, National Association
modifications to the Guarantee Agreement dated
Company and JPM, as amended (the “JPM Guarantee”), including but not limited to
amending the (i) EBITDA to Interest Expense ratio (as defined in the JPM
Guarantee), (ii) maximum ratio of Total Indebtedness to its Total Equity (as
defined in the JPM Guarantee) and (iii) minimum unencumbered Liquidity
requirement (as defined in the JPM Guarantee), each through
On
“Morgan Stanley Amendment”) by and between the Company and
Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC
and modifications to the Guaranty, dated
and Morgan Stanley (the “MS Guaranty”) including but not limited to amending the
(i) EBITDA to Interest Expense ratio (as defined in the MS Guaranty), (ii)
maximum ratio of Total Indebtedness to its Total Equity (as defined in the MS
Guaranty) and (iii) minimum unencumbered Liquidity requirement (as defined in
the MS Guaranty), each through
The foregoing descriptions of the JPM Amendment and Morgan Stanley Amendment do
not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to
the full text of the JPM Amendment and Morgan Stanley Amendment, which have been
filed with this Current Report on Form 8-K as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits. Exhibit No. Description 99.1 Amendment No. 4 to Guarantee Agreement, datedNovember 17, 2022 betweenACRES Commercial Realty Corp. andJPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association . 99.2 Amendment No. 1 to Guaranty, datedNovember 18, 2022 betweenACRES Commercial Realty Corp. andMorgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC . 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document).
——————————————————————————–
© Edgar Online, source
References in this quarterly report to "we," "us" or the "Company" refer toACRES Commercial Realty Corp. The following discussion and analysis of the Company's financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this report. Certain information contained in the discussion and analysis set forth below includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "continue," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," "estimate," "believe," "look forward" or other similar words or terms. Because such statements include risks, uncertainties and contingencies, actual results may differ materially from the expectations, intentions, beliefs, plans or predictions of the future expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For information identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, factors impacting whether we will be able to maintain our sources of liquidity and whether we will be able to identify sufficient suitable investments to increase our originations, please refer to the Risk Factors section of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 filed with theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Except as expressly required by applicable securities law, the Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We are aMaryland corporation and an externally managed real estate investment trust ("REIT") that is primarily focused on originating, holding and managing commercial real estate ("CRE") mortgage loans and equity investments in commercial real estate properties through direct ownership and joint ventures. Our manager isACRES Capital, LLC (our "Manager"), a subsidiary ofACRES Capital Corp. (collectively, "ACRES"), a private commercial real estate lender exclusively dedicated to nationwide middle market CRE lending with a focus on multifamily, student housing, hospitality, office and industrial property in topUnited States ("U.S.") markets. Our Manager draws upon the management team of ACRES and its collective investment experience to provide its services. Our objective is to provide our stockholders with total returns over time, including quarterly distributions and capital appreciation, while seeking to manage the risks associated with our investment strategies as well as to maximize long-term stockholder value by maintaining stability through our available liquidity and diversified CRE loan portfolio. InDecember 2019 , a novel strain of coronavirus ("COVID-19") was identified. The resulting spread of COVID-19 throughout the globe led theWorld Health Organization to designate COVID-19 as a pandemic and numerous countries, including theU.S , to declare national emergencies. Many countries responded to the initial and ensuing outbreaks of COVID-19 by instituting quarantines and restrictions on travel and limiting operations of non-essential offices and retail centers, which resulted in the closure or remote operation of non-essential businesses, increased rates of unemployment and market disruption in connection with the economic uncertainty. The aforementioned quarantines and travel restrictions contributed significantly to economic disruptions across the country that directly impacted our borrowers and their ability to pay and to stay current with their debt obligations in 2020 and 2021, causing significant increases in our provisions for credit losses. During the height of the pandemic, we used a variety of legal and structural options to manage credit risk effectively, including through forbearance and extension provisions or other agreements. Due in large part to the development and distribution of vaccines and other treatments, theU.S. and other countries around the world have eased or removed restrictions entirely, financial markets are more liquid, collateral performance has improved and unemployment rates have stabilized to some degree; as such, atSeptember 30, 2022 , we have substantially reversed provisions for credit losses related to macroeconomic factors impacted by COVID-19. For additional discussion with respect to the potential impact of COVID-19 on our liquidity and capital resources, see "Liquidity and Capital Resources." Currently, domestic and global markets are grappling with managing rising inflation rates, supply chain disruptions and energy market dislocations. These additional market pressures are manifesting themselves in higher consumer prices and have led domestic and global monetary policy makers to raise historically low short-term interest rates at rates much faster than originally anticipated by domestic and global financial markets in hopes of containing inflation and staving off or tempering an economic recession. TheU.S. Federal Reserve has raised the Federal Funds rate by 3.00% in five rate hikes betweenMarch 2022 andSeptember 2022 to combat inflation, and more rate hikes are expected in the near future. These increases in the cost of capital and goods are expected to cause short-term dislocations in various investment and financing markets in which we participate as we and other market participants adjust to the new financing environment. We continuously monitor the effects of domestic and global events, including but not limited to the current and expected impacts of inflation, labor shortages, supply chain matters and rising interest rates, on our operations and financial position to ensure that we remain responsive and adaptable to the dynamic changes in our operating environment. However, it is inherently difficult to (Back to Index) 38
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
accurately assess the continuing impact of domestic or global macroeconomic events on our revenues, profitability and financial position. In response, we continue to actively and responsibly manage corporate liquidity and operations in light of changing macroeconomic circumstances, and our Manager continuously monitors for new capital opportunities and executes on agreements that are expected to enhance our returns. We target originating transitional floating-rate CRE loans between$10.0 million and$100.0 million . During the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , we originated six and 18 floating-rate CRE whole loans, respectively, with total commitments of$181.3 million and$592.8 million , respectively. We anticipate that our CRE loan originations, CRE debt securitizations and other CRE-related investments for the year endedDecember 31, 2022 will be between$600.0 million and$800.0 million .
Our CRE loan portfolio, which had
at
• First mortgage loans, which we refer to as whole loans. These loans are
typically secured by first liens on CRE property, including the following
property types: multifamily, office, hotel, self-storage, retail, student
housing, manufactured housing, industrial, healthcare and mixed-use. At
value of$2.1 billion and$1.9 billion , respectively, or 99.8%, of the CRE loan portfolio.
• Mezzanine debt is senior to the borrower’s equity but is subordinated to
other third-party debt. These loans are subordinated CRE loans, usually
secured by a pledge of the borrower’s equity ownership in the entity that
owns the property or by a second lien mortgage on the property. AtSeptember 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , our mezzanine loan had a carrying value of$4.5 million and$4.4 million , respectively, or 0.2% of the CRE loan portfolio. We generate our income primarily from the spread between the revenues we receive from our assets and the cost to finance our ownership of those assets, including corporate debt. While the CRE whole loans included in the CRE loan portfolio are substantially composed of floating-rate loans benchmarked to market rates including theLondon Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") and the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR"), asset yields are protected through the use of benchmark floors and minimum interest periods that typically range from 12 to 18 months at the time of a loan's origination. Our benchmark floors provide asset yield protection when the benchmark rate falls below an in-place benchmark floor. Our net investment returns are enhanced by a decline in the cost of our floating-rate liabilities that do not have benchmark floors. Our net investment returns will be negatively impacted by the rising cost of our floating-rate liabilities that do not have floors until the benchmark rate is above the benchmark floor, at which point our floating-rate loans and floating-rate liabilities will be match funded, effectively locking in our net interest margin until the benchmark floor rate is activated again or the floating-rate loan is paid off or refinanced. AtSeptember 30, 2022 , our$2.1 billion floating-rate CRE loan portfolio, at par, which includes one whole loan without a benchmark floor, had a weighted average benchmark floor of 0.67%. AtDecember 31, 2021 , our par-value$1.9 billion floating-rate CRE loan portfolio, which included one loan without a benchmark floor, had a weighted average benchmark floor of 0.75%. The decrease in the weighted average benchmark floor was a result of older CRE floating-rate loans with higher floors paying off and being replaced with newer loans with lower floors. With the trend of rising benchmark rates in 2022 (both LIBOR and SOFR), we have seen the coupons on all of our floating-rate assets and debt rise accordingly. Because we have equity invested in each floating-rate loan, and because in all instances the benchmark rates are above our loan floors, the rise in interest rates expected by the market will result in an increase in our net interest income. See "Interest Rate Risk" in "Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk." (Back to
Index)
39
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
Our portfolio comprises loans with a diverse array of collateral types. We
increased our multifamily portfolio allocation to 75.0% at
from 69.7% at
allocation by property type at
[[Image Removed]][[Image Removed]]
All but two of our loans were current on contractual payments atSeptember 30, 2022 . Each of these two loans, which were in maturity default, had recent appraisals in excess of their par balances and, as such, did not require individual reserves for current expected credit losses ("CECL"). Additionally, we have executed extensions on six loans at a weighted average extension of two months in exchange for$254,000 of fees during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 .
Our CRE mezzanine loan earns interest at a fixed rate.
From time to time, we may acquire real estate property through direct equity investments or as a result of our lending activities. AtSeptember 30, 2022 , the total carrying value of our net real estate-related assets and liabilities was$82.6 million on four properties owned. The existence of net capital loss carryforwards available untilDecember 31, 2025 , allows for potential future capital gains on these investments to be shielded from income taxes. Additionally, atSeptember 30, 2022 , our investments in real estate comprise two hotel properties with a combined carrying value of$53.3 million classified as properties held for sale and offset by liabilities held for sale of$3.0 million . We use leverage to enhance our returns. The cost of borrowings to finance our investments is a significant part of our expenses. Our net interest income depends on our ability to control these expenses relative to our revenue. Our CRE loans may initially be financed with term facilities, such as CRE loan warehouse financing facilities, in anticipation of their ultimate securitization. We ultimately seek to finance our CRE loans through the use of non-recourse long-term, match-funded CRE debt securitizations.
Our asset-specific borrowings comprised term warehouse financing facilities, CRE
debt securitizations, our senior secured financing facility and mortgage
payable. We executed the optional redemptions on
2020-
(“XAN 2020-RSO8”) in
AtSeptember 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , we had outstanding balances on our CRE loan term warehouse financing facilities of$379.1 million and$66.8 million , respectively, or 19.8% and 3.7%, respectively, of total outstanding borrowings. AtSeptember 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , we had outstanding balances of$1.2 billion and$1.5 billion , respectively, on CRE debt securitizations, or 64.4% and 80.8%, respectively, of total outstanding borrowings. AtSeptember 30, 2022 , we had outstanding borrowings on our senior secured financing facility of$85.5 million , or 4.5% of total outstanding borrowings. AtSeptember 30, 2022 , we had outstanding borrowings on our mortgage payable of$18.2 million , or 1.0% of total outstanding borrowings. AtDecember 31, 2021 , we had no outstanding borrowings on our senior secured financing facility nor on our mortgage payable. InFebruary 2022 , we repurchased$39.8 million par value of our 4.50% convertible senior notes due 2022 ("4.50% Convertible Senior Notes"). In conjunction with the repurchase, we accelerated$460,000 of the convertible note discount, which was recorded as an extinguishment of debt cost, and$114,000 of deferred debt issuance costs, which were recorded in interest expense. InAugust 2022 , the remaining$48.2 million of outstanding notes were paid off upon maturity at par. (Back to Index) 40
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
InJanuary 2020 , we adopted updated accounting guidance that replaced the incurred loss approach with the CECL model for the determination of our allowance for loan losses. We reevaluate our CECL allowance quarterly, incorporating our current expectations of macroeconomic factors considered in the determination of our CECL reserves. AtSeptember 30, 2022 , the CECL allowance on our CRE loan portfolio was$7.9 million , or 0.37% of our$2.1 billion loan portfolio. AtDecember 31, 2021 , the CECL allowance on our CRE loan portfolio was$8.8 million , or 0.46% of our$1.9 billion of our loan portfolio. During the three months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , we recorded a provision for credit losses that reflected current macroeconomic expectations related to rising inflation, interest rates and expected unemployment. For the year endedDecember 31, 2021 , we recorded net reversals of credit losses, which at the time, reflected improvements in macroeconomic conditions, improved collateral operating performance and improvements in or resolutions of individually-evaluated loans. Additionally, the steady decline in our CECL reserves from our highest reserve balance inJune 30, 2020 of$61.1 million , or 3.44% of the par balance of our CRE loan portfolio, to our current reserve balance atSeptember 30, 2022 of$7.9 million , or 0.37% of the par balance of our CRE loan portfolio, has been due to the following: the successful resolution of our individually evaluated loans with specific reserves, the overall newer vintage of our CRE loan portfolio (with 16.3% of the portfolio, atSeptember 30, 2022 , being originated prior to the fourth quarter of 2020) as well as the increasing percentage allocation of our CRE loan portfolio to multifamily loans over time. Multifamily loans have historically had the lowest credit losses of any asset class for us and as a sample population in the third-party model that we use to support our CECL reserves. Our percentage allocation of our CRE loan portfolio to multifamily has grown from 58.4% atJune 30, 2020 to 75.0% atSeptember 30, 2022 . During the three months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , we recorded no charge-offs. During the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , we recorded$2.3 million in charge-offs, primarily attributable to the discounted payoff of one loan that resulted in a realized loss of$2.3 million for which a CECL allowance was established atDecember 31, 2021 . We historically used derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk associated with our borrowings. InApril 2020 , we terminated all interest rate hedges in conjunction with the disposition of our financed commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS") portfolio. AtSeptember 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , we had unrealized losses in connection with the terminated hedges of$7.1 million and$8.5 million , respectively, which will be amortized into interest expense over the remaining life of the debt. We recognized amortization expense on these terminated contracts of$438,000 and$1.4 million , respectively, during the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 . Common stock book value was$25.08 per share atSeptember 30, 2022 , a$1.21 per share increase fromDecember 31, 2021 , primarily resulting from the accretive benefit of our board of directors, or our Board-approved common stock repurchase program, offset by net losses from operations incurred during the quarter.
Impact of Reference Rate Reform
As discussed in the "Overview" section above, our CRE whole loans and our asset-specific borrowings are primarily benchmarked to one-month LIBOR. InMarch 2021 , theUnited Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority announced that it would cease publication of the one-week and two-month USD LIBOR immediately afterDecember 31, 2021 and cease publication of the remaining tenors immediately afterJune 30, 2023 . While there is no consensus on what rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR, theU.S. Federal Reserve , in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprising largeU.S. financial institutions, has identified SOFR, a new index calculated by short-term repurchase agreements backed byU.S. Treasury securities, as its preferred alternative rate for LIBOR. All our underwritten loans contain terms that allow for a change to an alternative benchmark rate upon the discontinuation of LIBOR. InSeptember 2021 ,January 2022 andFebruary 2022 , the term warehouse financing facilities withJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A . ("JPMorgan Chase"),Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC ("Morgan Stanley") and Barclays Bank PLC ("Barclays"), respectively, were amended to allow for the transition to alternative rates, including rates tied to SOFR, subject to benchmark transition events. Beginning inJanuary 2022 , all loans are underwritten using SOFR as the benchmark rate. The transition from LIBOR to SOFR or to another alternative rate may result in financial market disruptions and significant increases in benchmark rates, resulting in increased financing costs to us, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and the market price of our common stock. Further discussion of the risk related to ongoing reference rate reform is provided in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2021 .
Results of Operations
Our net income allocable to common shares for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2022 was$713,000 , or$0.08 per share-basic ($0.08 per share-diluted). Our net loss allocable to common shares for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 was$1.4 million , or$(0.15) per share-basic ($(0.15 ) per share-diluted), as compared to net (loss) income allocable to common shares for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2021 of($9.8) million , or$(1.03) per share-basic ($(1.03 ) per share-diluted) and$10.7 million , or$1.09 per share-basic ($1.09 per share-diluted), respectively. (Back to
Index)
41
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index) Net Interest Income The following tables analyze the change in interest income and interest expense for the comparative three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021 by changes in volume and changes in rates. The changes attributable to the combined changes in volume and rate have been allocated proportionately, based on absolute values, to the changes due to volume and changes due to rates (dollars in thousands, except amounts in footnotes): Three Months Ended
September 30, 2021 Due to Changes in Percent Net Change Change (1) Volume Rate Increase (decrease) in interest income: CRE whole loans (2)$ 10,069 43 %$ 4,970 $ 5,099 Legacy CRE loan (2)(3) (159 ) (100 )% (189 ) 30 Other 169 423 % 169 - Total increase in interest income 10,079 42 % 4,950 5,129 Increase (decrease) in interest expense: Securitized borrowings: (4) XAN 2020-RSO8 Senior Notes (1,227 ) (100 )% (1,227 ) - XAN 2020-RSO9 Senior Notes (2,053 ) (100 )% (2,053 ) - ACR 2021-FL1 Senior Notes 3,491 107 % (132 ) 3,623 ACR 2021-FL2 Senior Notes 6,182 100 % 6,182 - Senior secured financing facility 502 64 % 502 - CRE - term warehouse financing facilities (4) 3,264 225 % 2,142 1,122 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes (4) (2,093 ) (83 )% (2,093 ) - 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes (4) 1,158 101 % 1,158 - 12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes (4) (1,048 ) (97 )% (1,048 ) - Unsecured junior subordinated debentures 280 52 % - 280 Hedging (51 ) (11 )% (51 ) - Total increase in interest expense 8,405 58 % 3,380 5,025 Net increase in net interest income$ 1,674 $ 1,570 $ 104
(1) Percent change is calculated as the net change divided by the respective
interest income or interest expense for the three months ended
2021.
(2) Includes an increase in fee income of
of
respectively, that were due to changes in volume.
(3) Includes the change in interest income recognized on one legacy CRE loan with
an amortized cost of
loan on the consolidated balance sheet. The loan paid off in
(4) Includes decreases in amortization expense of
on our securitized borrowings, 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes and 12.00%
senior unsecured notes, respectively, and increases in amortization expense
of
5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes, respectively, that were due to changes in volume. (Back to Index) 42
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2022 Compared to Nine Months Ended
Due to Changes in Percent Net Change Change (1) Volume Rate Increase (decrease) in interest income: CRE whole loans (2)$ 11,010 15 %$ 13,080 $ (2,070 ) Legacy CRE loan (2)(3) (449 ) (94 )% (509 ) 60 CRE preferred equity investments (2) (1,378 ) (100 )% (1,378 ) - CMBS (161 ) (100 )% (161 ) - Other 210 288 % 210 - Total increase in interest income 9,232 12 % 11,242 (2,010 ) Increase (decrease) in interest expense: Securitized borrowings: (4) XAN 2019-RSO7 Senior Notes (5,172 ) (100 )% (5,172 ) - XAN 2020-RSO8 Senior Notes (5,548 ) (82 )% (5,976 ) 428 XAN 2020-RSO9 Senior Notes (6,517 ) (87 )% (6,787 ) 270 ACR 2021-FL1 Senior Notes 9,210 185 % 378 8,832 ACR 2021-FL2 Senior Notes 13,471 100 % 13,471 - Senior secured financing facility (803 ) (26 )% (803 ) - CRE - term warehouse financing facilities (4) 4,800 140 % 3,611 1,189 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes (4) (4,984 ) (65 )% (4,984 ) - 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes (4) 5,763 502 % 5,763 - 12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes (4) (3,920 ) (93 )% (3,920 ) - Unsecured junior subordinated debentures 383 24 % - 383 Hedging (52 ) (4 )% (52 ) - Total increase in interest expense 6,631 14 % (4,471 ) 11,102 Net increase (decrease) in net interest income$ 2,601 $ 15,713 $ (13,112 )
(1) Percent change is calculated as the net change divided by the respective
interest income or interest expense for the nine months ended
2021.
(2) Includes decreases in fee income of
our CRE whole loans and legacy CRE loan, respectively, and an increase of
volume.
(3) Includes the change in interest income recognized on one legacy CRE loan with
an amortized cost of
loan on the consolidated balance sheet. The loan paid off in
(4) Includes decreases in amortization expense of
12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes, respectively, and increases in amortization
expense of
facilities and 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes, respectively, that were due to
changes in volume.
Net Change in Interest Income for the Comparative three and nine months ended
Aggregate interest income increased by
comparative three and nine months ended
respectively. We attribute the changes to the following:
CRE whole loans. The increase of$10.1 million for the comparative three months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021 was primarily attributable to an increase in the benchmark rates and a net increase in the size of the total loan portfolio over the comparative periods. The increase of$11.0 million for the comparative nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021 was primarily attributable to a net increase in the size of the total loan portfolio period over the comparative periods. The aforementioned increase over the comparative nine months was partially offset by a net decline in loan yields attributable to a decline in the weighted-average rate floors on our total loan portfolio.
Legacy CRE loan. The decrease of
remaining legacy CRE whole loan in
CRE preferred equity investments. The decrease of
comparative nine months ended
the payoffs of the preferred equity investments in
CMBS. The decrease of
remaining CMBS securities in
(Back to
Index)
43
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
Net Change in Interest Expense for the Comparative three and nine months ended
Aggregate interest expense increased by
comparative three and nine months ended
respectively. We attribute the changes to the following:
Securitized borrowings. The net increases of$6.4 million and$5.4 million for the comparative three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were primarily attributable to the issuance ofACRES Commercial Realty 2021-FL2 Issuer, Ltd. ("ACR 2021-FL2") and an increase in benchmark rates over the comparative periods. These increases were partially offset by the liquidations ofExantas Capital Corp. 2019-RSO7, Ltd. ("XAN 2019-RSO7"), XAN 2020-RSO8 and XAN 2020-RSO9. Senior secured financing facility. The increase of$502,000 for the comparative three months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021 was attributable to increased utilization of the senior secured financing facility in the third quarter 2022. The decrease of$803,000 for the comparative nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 was attributable to overall lower utilization of the senior secured financing facility during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 as compared to the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2021 . CRE - term warehouse financing facilities. The increases of$3.3 million and$4.8 million for the comparative three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were primarily attributable to the increased utilization of these facilities during the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 . 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes. The decreases of$2.1 million and$5.0 million for the comparative three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were primarily attributable to the partial redemption of$55.7 million of our outstanding 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes during the year endedDecember 31, 2021 and the redemption of the remaining$88.0 million of our 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 . 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes. The increases of$1.2 million and$5.8 million for the comparative three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were attributable to the issuance of our 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes inAugust 2021 . 12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2027. The decreases of$1.0 million and$3.9 million for the comparative three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were attributable to the redemption of the entire outstanding balance of our 12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes inAugust 2021 . Unsecured junior subordinated debentures. The increases of$280,000 and$383,000 for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were attributable to an increase in the benchmark interest rate for our unsecured junior subordinated debentures, over the comparative periods. (Back to
Index)
44
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
Average Net Yield and Average Cost of Funds:
The following tables present the average net yield and average cost of funds for
the three and nine months ended
thousands, except amounts in footnotes):
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 Average Net Yield Interest Average Net Interest (Cost of Average Income Yield (Cost of Income Funds) Balance (Expense) Funds) (1) Average Balance (Expense) (1) Interest-earning assets CRE whole loans, floating-rate (2)$ 2,079,131 $ 33,736 6.44 %$ 1,724,333 $ 23,667 5.45 % Legacy CRE loan (2) - - - % 11,516 159 5.49 % CRE mezzanine loan 4,700 120 9.96 % 4,700 120 9.96 % Other 62,436 209 1.33 % 74,564 40 0.21 % Total interest income/average net yield 2,146,267 34,065 6.30 % 1,815,113 23,986 5.25 %
Interest-bearing
liabilities
Collateralized by: CRE whole loans (3)(4) 1,659,729 (18,923 ) (4.59 )% 1,186,301 (8,764 ) (2.75 )% General corporate debt: Unsecured junior subordinated debentures 51,548 (820 ) (6.22 )% 51,548 (540 ) (4.10 )% 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes (5) 22,970 (443 ) (7.56 )% 119,159 (2,536 ) (8.33 )% 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes (6) 147,280 (2,306 ) (6.21 )% 73,379 (1,148 ) (6.21 )% 12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes (7)(8) - (32 ) - % 26,047 (1,080 ) (16.44 )% Hedging (9) - (415 ) - % - (466 ) - % Total interest expense/average cost of funds$ 1,881,527 (22,939 ) (4.80 )%$ 1,456,434 (14,534 ) (3.67 )% Total net interest income$ 11,126 $ 9,452
(1) Average net yield includes net amortization/accretion and fee income and is
computed based on average amortized cost.
(2) Includes fee income of
months ended
loans and legacy CRE loan, respectively, for the three months ended
(3) Includes amortization expense of
months ended
interest-bearing liabilities collateralized by CRE whole loans.
(4) The average cost of funds for the three months ended
excludes the impact of amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and
unused fees incurred on a CRE term warehouse facility that was unused during
the period.
(5) Includes aggregated amortization expense of
three months ended
Convertible Senior Notes. The amortization expense for the three months ended
issuance costs in connection with the repurchase of
amount of 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes during the period.
(6) Includes amortization expense of
ended
Unsecured Notes.
(7) Includes amortization expense of
endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, on our 12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes. The amortization expense for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2021 included$218,000 of acceleration of deferred debt issuance costs in connection with the redemption of all$50.0 million principal amount of 12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes during the period.
(8) The outstanding par balance of our 12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes was redeemed
in full in
2022, we were permitted to elect to issue up to
additional notes. The interest expense incurred during the three months ended
the remaining availability.
(9) Includes net amortization expense of
months ended
interest rate swap agreements that were in net loss positions at the time of
termination. The remaining losses, reported in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income on the consolidated balance sheets, will be accreted over the remaining life of the debt. (Back to Index) 45
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index) For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 Interest Average Net Interest Average Net Average Income Yield (Cost of Income Yield (Cost Balance (Expense) Funds) (1) Average Balance (Expense) of Funds) (1) Interest-earning assets CRE whole loans, floating-rate (2)$ 1,972,750 $ 83,093 5.63 %$ 1,616,398 $ 72,083 5.96 % Legacy CRE loan (2) 211 29 18.08 % 11,516 478 5.55 % CRE mezzanine loan 4,700 355 9.96 % 4,700 355 9.96 % CRE preferred equity investments (2) - - - % 10,967 1,378 16.80 % CMBS - - - % 5,610 161 3.89 % Other 85,395 283 0.44 % 73,031 73 0.13 % Total interest income/average net yield 2,063,056 83,760 5.43 % 1,722,222 74,528 5.78 %
Interest-bearing
liabilities
Collateralized by: CRE whole loans (3) 1,545,493 (40,351 ) (3.42 )% 1,153,709 (30,910 ) (3.48 )% General corporate debt: Unsecured junior subordinated debentures 51,548 (2,001 ) (5.12 )% 51,548 (1,618 ) (4.14 )% 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes (4) 45,795 (2,690 ) (7.75 )% 131,785 (7,674 ) (7.68 )% 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes (5) 147,134 (6,911 ) (6.28 )% 24,729 (1,148 ) (6.21 )% 12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes (6)(7) - (306 ) - % 39,615 (4,226 ) (14.26 )% Hedging (8) - (1,332 ) - % - (1,384 ) - % Total interest expense/average cost of funds$ 1,789,970 (53,591 ) (3.81 )%$ 1,401,386 (46,960 ) (4.25 )% Total net interest income$ 30,169 $ 27,568
(1) Average net yield includes net amortization/accretion and fee income and is
computed based on average amortized cost.
(2) Includes fee income of
months ended
loans and legacy CRE loan, respectively, for the nine months ended
amortization expense of
investments in connection with their payoffs.
(3) Includes amortization expense of
months ended
interest-bearing liabilities collateralized by CRE whole loans.
(4) Includes amortization expense of
months ended
Convertible Senior Notes. The amortization expense for the nine months ended
issuance costs in connection with the repurchase of
amount of 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes during the period.
(5) Includes amortization expense of
ended
Unsecured Notes.
(6) Includes amortization expense of
ended
Unsecured Notes. The amortization expense for the nine months ended September
30, 2021 included
connection with the redemption of all
12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes during the period.
(7) The outstanding par balance of our 12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes was redeemed
in full in
2022, we were permitted to elect to issue up to
additional notes. The interest expense incurred during the nine months ended
on the remaining availability.
(8) Includes net amortization expense of
nine months ended
interest rate swap agreements that were in net loss positions at the time of
termination. The remaining losses, reported in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income on the consolidated balance sheets, will be accreted over the remaining life of the debt.
Real Estate Income and Other Revenue
The following table sets forth information relating to our real estate income
and other revenue for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 2021 Dollar Change Percent Change Real estate income and other revenue: Real estate income$ 9,785 $ 2,627 $ 7,158 272 % Other revenue 25 17 8 47 % Total$ 9,810 $ 2,644 $ 7,166 271 % (Back to Index) 46
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index) For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 2021 Dollar Change Percent Change Real estate income and other revenue: Real estate income$ 21,700 $ 7,013 $ 14,687 209 % Other revenue 60 49 11 22 % Total$ 21,760 $ 7,062 $ 14,698 208 % Aggregate real estate income and other revenue increased by$7.2 million and$14.7 million for the comparative three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. We attribute the changes to the acquisition of two revenue-generating properties in the fourth quarter of 2021 and two additional revenue-generating properties in the second quarter of 2022. Real estate income at our hotel property acquired in 2020 additionally benefited from increased personal and business travel resulting from lifted COVID-19 restrictions that occurred late in the spring of 2022. In the third quarter 2022, we received the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure on a hotel property that also contributed to the increase in real estate income for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2022 .
Operating Expenses
The following tables set forth information relating to our operating expenses
for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 2021 Dollar Change Percent Change Operating expenses: General and administrative$ 2,128 $ 2,664 $ (536 ) (20 )% Real estate expenses 10,099 2,401 7,698 321 % Management fees - related party 1,669 1,700 (31 ) (2 )% Equity compensation - related party 913 771 142 18 % Corporate depreciation and amortization 21 16 5 31 % Provision for credit losses, net 2,620 537 2,083 388 % Total$ 17,450 $ 8,089 $ 9,361 116 % For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 2021 Dollar Change Percent Change Operating expenses: General and administrative$ 7,938 $ 8,533 $ (595 ) (7 )% Real estate expenses 24,055 6,713 17,342 258 % Management fees - related party 5,023 4,405 618 14 % Equity compensation - related party 2,648 961 1,687 176 % Corporate depreciation and amortization 64 75 (11 ) (15 )% Provision for (reversal of) credit losses, net 1,342 (15,447 ) 16,789 109 % Total$ 41,070 $ 5,240 $ 35,830 684 % (Back to Index) 47
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
Aggregate operating expenses increased by
comparative three and nine months ended
respectively. We attribute the changes to the following:
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses decreased by$536,000 and$595,000 for the comparative three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The following tables summarize the information relating to our general and administrative expenses for the periods presented (dollars in thousands): For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 2021 Dollar Change Percent Change General and administrative: Professional services$ 1,009 $ 1,240 $ (231 ) (19 )% D&O insurance 339 366 (27 ) (7 )% Wages and benefits 317 339 (22 ) (6 )% Operating expenses 216 300 (84 ) (28 )% Director fees 206 207 (1 ) (0 )% Dues and subscriptions 121 177 (56 ) (32 )% Rent and utilities 29 30 (1 ) (3 )% Travel 5 4 1 25 % Tax penalties, interest and franchise tax (114 ) 1 (115 ) (11500 )% Total$ 2,128 $ 2,664 $ (536 ) (20 )% For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 2021 Dollar Change Percent Change General and administrative: Professional services$ 4,058 $ 4,280 $ (222 ) (5 )% D&O insurance 1,054 1,031 23 2 % Wages and benefits 966 1,157 (191 ) (17 )% Operating expenses 584 837 (253 ) (30 )% Director fees 619 502 117 23 % Dues and subscriptions 513 545 (32 ) (6 )% Rent and utilities 86 92 (6 ) (7 )% Travel 31 20 11 55 % Tax penalties, interest and franchise tax 27 69 (42 ) (61 )% Total$ 7,938 $ 8,533 $ (595 ) (7 )% The decrease in general and administrative expense for the comparative three months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021 was primarily attributable to (i) a decrease in professional services reimbursable to the Manager and (ii) a decrease in tax penalties, interest and franchise tax in connection with the receipt of approximately$123,000 of interest income in the third quarter 2022 related to the receipt of a 2017 federal tax refund.
The decrease in general and administrative expense for the comparative nine
months ended
decrease in operating expenses related to (i) a decrease in computer software
fees, (ii) a decrease in printing fees and (iii) a decrease in operating
expenses and professional services reimbursable to the Manager.
Real estate expenses. The increases of$7.7 million and$17.3 million for the comparative three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were primarily attributable to the acquisition of two properties, a hotel and a student housing complex, inApril 2022 , as well as the acquisition of two office properties inOctober 2021 . The increase for the comparative three and nine months was also attributable to increased operating expenses incurred on a hotel property acquired inNovember 2020 due to growth in its operations in the current year and due to the incremental operating expenses incurred on a hotel property on which we received the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure inJuly 2022 . (Back to Index) 48
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
Management fees - related party. The increase of$618,000 for the comparative nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021 was primarily attributable to an increase in our base management fees during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 . As ofJuly 31, 2020 , as part of the Fourth Amended and Restated Management Agreement, as amended ("Management Agreement"), the monthly base management fee payable to our Manager was amended to be the greater of 1/12th of the amount of our equity multiplied by 1.50% or$442,000 throughJuly 31, 2022 . InJune 2021 , the base management fee calculation exceeded the$442,000 for the first time since the execution of the Management Agreement in connection with the issuance of the 7.875% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series D Preferred Stock"). As a result, the management fees incurred during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 were greater than those incurred during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2021 . Equity compensation - related party. The increase of$1.7 million for the comparative nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021 was primarily attributable to shares granted in the second quarter 2022 and the second quarter 2021 under our Manager Incentive Plan, which will vest 25% for four years, on each anniversary of the issuance date. Provision for (reversal of) credit losses, net. The provisions for credit losses of$2.6 million and$1.3 million for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , respectively, were primarily attributable to a general decline in macroeconomic conditions. The provision for credit losses of$537,000 for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2021 was primarily attributable to an increase in the size of the CRE loan portfolio and the net reversal of credit losses of$15.4 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2021 was attributable to overall, general improvements in expected macroeconomic conditions at the time and improvements in property-level operations on loan collateral at that time.
Other Income (Expense)
The following tables set forth information relating to our other income
(expense) incurred for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 2021 Dollar Change Percent Change Other income (expense): Loss on extinguishment of debt -$ (9,006 ) 9,006 100 % Gain on sale of real estate$ 1,870 - $ 1,870 100 % Other income 130 71 59 83 % Total$ 2,000 $ (8,935 ) $ 10,935 122 % For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 2021 Dollar Change Percent Change Other income (expense): Net realized and unrealized gain on investment securities available-for-sale and loans and derivatives $ - $ 878 $ (878 ) (100 )% Loss on extinguishment of debt (460 ) (9,006 ) 8,546 95 % Gain on sale of real estate 1,870 - 1,870 100 % Other income 1,103 505 598 118 % Total$ 2,513 $ (7,623 ) $ 10,136 133 %
Aggregate other income increased
comparative three and nine months ended
respectively. We attribute the changes to the following:
Net realized and unrealized gain on investment securities available-for-sale and loans and derivatives. The decrease of$878,000 for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 was attributable to the sale of our two remaining CMBS securities for proceeds of$3.0 million , which generated non-recurring gains of$878,000 inMarch 2021 . Loss on extinguishment of debt. The decrease of$8.5 million during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 was attributable to the partial redemption of our 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes inFebruary 2022 , which resulted in$460,000 of non-cash losses in connection with the ratable acceleration of the 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes' market discount, as well as the full redemption of our 12.00% Senior Unsecured Notes in the third quarter of 2021 which resulted in a loss of$7.8 million .
Gain on sale of real estate. The increase of
nine months ended
property in the
gains.
(Back to Index) 49
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
Other Income. The increase of$598,000 during the comparative nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021, was primarily attributable to a loan recovery received during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 on a middle market loan that was previously charged off.
Financial Condition
Summary
Our total assets were
Investment Portfolio
The tables below summarize the amortized cost and net carrying amount of our
investment portfolio, classified by asset type, at
footnotes):
Net
Carrying Percent of
At September 30, 2022 Amortized Cost Amount (1) Portfolio Weighted Average Coupon Loans held for investment: CRE whole loans, floating-rate$ 2,125,945 $ 2,118,342 93.84 % 6.43% CRE mezzanine loan 4,700 4,453 0.20 % 10.00% 2,130,645 2,122,795 94.04 % Other investments: Investments in unconsolidated entities 1,548 1,548 0.07 % N/A (4) Investments in real estate (2) 82,555 82,555 3.66 % N/A (4) Property held for sale (3) 50,232 50,232 2.23 % N/A (4) 134,335 134,335 5.96 % Total investment portfolio$ 2,264,980 $ 2,257,130 100.00 % Net
Carrying Percent of
At December 31, 2021 Amortized Cost Amount (1) Portfolio Weighted Average Coupon Loans held for investment: CRE whole loans, floating-rate (5)$ 1,877,851 $ 1,869,301 95.44 % 4.43% CRE mezzanine loan 4,700 4,445 0.23 % 10.00% 1,882,551 1,873,746 95.67 % Other investments: Investments in unconsolidated entities 1,548 1,548 0.08 % N/A (4) Investment in real estate (2) 65,465 65,465 3.34 % N/A (4) Property held for sale 17,846 17,846 0.91 % N/A (4) 84,859 84,859 4.33 % Total investment portfolio$ 1,967,410 $ 1,958,605 100.00 %
(1) Net carrying amount includes an allowance for credit losses of
and
(2) Includes real estate-related right of use assets of
million, intangible assets of
liabilities of
respectively. Also includes a mortgage payable of
30, 2022.
(3) Includes property held for sale-related liabilities of
(4) There are no stated rates associated with these investments.
(5) Includes one legacy CRE whole loan with an amortized cost of
December 31, 2021 , that paid off inJanuary 2022 . CRE loans. During the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , we originated$592.8 million of floating-rate CRE whole loan commitments (of which$86.9 million was unfunded loan commitments), funded$43.7 million of previously unfunded loan commitments and received$285.0 million in proceeds from loan payoffs and paydowns. (Back to Index) 50
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
The following is a summary of our loans (dollars in thousands, except amounts in footnotes): Unamortized Contractual (Discount) Allowance for Interest Maturity Description Quantity Principal Premium, net (1) Amortized Cost Credit Losses Carrying Value Rates (2)
Dates (3)(4) AtSeptember 30, 2022 : 1M BR plus 2.75% to October 2022 Whole loans (5)(6) 87$ 2,140,129 $ (14,184 ) $ 2,125,945 $ (7,603 ) $ 2,118,342 1M BR plus 8.50% to July 2026 Mezzanine loan (5) 1 4,700 - 4,700 (247 ) 4,453 10.00% June 2028 Total$ 2,144,829 $ (14,184 ) $ 2,130,645 $ (7,850 ) $ 2,122,795 AtDecember 31, 2021 : January 2022 1M BR plus 2.70% to to September Whole loans (5)(6) 93$ 1,891,795 $ (13,944 ) $ 1,877,851 $ (8,550 ) $ 1,869,301 1M BR plus 8.50% 2025 Mezzanine loan (5) 1 4,700 - 4,700 (255 ) 4,445 10.00% June 2028 Total$ 1,896,495 $ (13,944 ) $ 1,882,551 $ (8,805 ) $ 1,873,746
(1) Amounts include unamortized loan origination fees of
million and deferred amendment fees of
2022 and
unamortized loan acquisition costs of
(2) Our whole loan portfolio of
weighted-average one-month benchmark rate (“BR”) floors of 0.67% and 0.75% at
comprise one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or one-month Term
Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”). At
benchmark floors.
(3) Maturity dates exclude contractual extension options, subject to the
satisfaction of certain terms that may be available to the borrowers.
(4) Maturity dates exclude two and three whole loans, with amortized costs of
and
(5) Substantially all loans are pledged as collateral under various borrowings at
both
(6) CRE whole loans had
commitments at
unfunded loan commitments are advanced as the borrowers formally request
additional funding and meet certain benchmarks, as permitted under the loan
agreement, and any necessary approvals have been obtained.
AtSeptember 30, 2022 , 23.9%, 22.8% and 15.5% of our CRE loan portfolio was concentrated in the Southwest, Southeast and Mountain regions, respectively, based on carrying value, as defined by the NCREIF. AtDecember 31, 2021 , 28.4%, 18.4% and 15.2% of our CRE loan portfolio was concentrated in the Southeast, Southwest and Mid-Atlantic regions respectively, based on carrying value. AtSeptember 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , no single loan or investment represented more than 10% of our total assets and no single investment group generated over 10% of our revenue. Investments in unconsolidated entities. Our investments in unconsolidated entities atSeptember 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 comprised a 100% interest in the common shares of Resource Capital Trust I ("RCT I") andRCC Trust II ("RCT II"), with a value of$1.5 million in the aggregate, or 3.0% of each trust. We record our investments in RCT I's and RCT II's common shares as investments in unconsolidated entities using the cost method, recording dividend income when declared by RCT I and RCT II. We recorded dividends from our investments in RCT I's and RCT II's common shares, reported in other revenue on the consolidated statement of operations, of$25,000 and$60,000 during the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 . During the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2021 , we recorded dividends of$16,000 and$49,000 , respectively. Investments in real estate and property held for sale. During the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , we acquired two new real estate properties through direct equity investments. We determined that the acquisition of the two properties should be accounted for as asset acquisitions. The combined acquisition-date fair value of$51.6 million was determined using third-party valuations. InJuly 2022 , we received the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure on a hotel property in the Northeast region. We determined that the acquisition of the property should be accounted for as an asset acquisition, and the acquisition-date fair value of$14.3 million was determined using a third-party valuation. The carrying value of the property was$13.4 million atSeptember 30, 2022 and was reported as property held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet. There was no gain or loss recognized on conversion of the loan to property held for sale. InSeptember 2022 , we sold an office property in the Midwest region that we previously designated as a property held for sale. The office property sold for$19.3 million with selling costs of approximately$532,000 , resulting in a gain on sale of$1.9 million
In
with a carrying value of
(Back to
Index)
51
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
The following table summarizes the book value of our investments in real estate and related intangible assets during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 (in thousands, except amounts in the footnotes): September 30, 2022 December 31, 2021 Accumulated Accumulated Depreciation & Carrying Depreciation & Carrying Cost Basis Amortization Value Cost Basis Amortization Value Assets acquired: Investments in real estate, equity: Investments in real estate (1)$ 116,781 $ (1,620 )$ 115,161 $ 27,065 $ (191 )$ 26,874 Right of use assets (2)(3) 19,664 (137 ) 19,527 - - - Intangible assets (4) 11,474 (2,343 ) 9,131 1,726 (806 ) 920 Subtotal 147,919 (4,100 ) 143,819 28,791 (997 ) 27,794 Investments in real estate from lending activities: Investment in real estate (5) - - - 34,124 (1,689 ) 32,435 Properties held for sale (6) 53,257 - 53,257 17,846 - 17,846 Right of use assets (3)(7) - - - 5,603 (95 ) 5,508 Intangible assets (8) - - - 3,337 (380 ) 2,957 Subtotal 53,257 - 53,257 60,910 (2,164 ) 58,746 Total 201,176 (4,100 ) 197,076 89,701 (3,161 ) 86,540 Liabilities assumed: Investments in real estate, equity: Mortgage payable (18,089 ) (104 ) (18,193 ) - - - Other liabilities (247 ) 174 (73 ) (247 ) 78 (169 ) Lease liabilities (3)(9) (43,260 ) 262 (42,998 ) - - - Subtotal (61,596 ) 332 (61,264 ) (247 ) 78 (169 ) Investments in real estate from lending activities: Liabilities held for sale (3,025 ) - (3,025 ) (3,113 ) 53 (3,060 ) Total (64,621 ) 332 (64,289 ) (3,360 ) 131 (3,229 ) Total net assets (10)$ 136,555 $ 132,787 $ 86,341 $ 83,311
(1) Includes
at
(2) Right of use assets, investments in real estate, equity include a right of
use associated with an acquired ground lease of
as an operating lease, an above-market lease intangible asset of
million and a customer list intangible of
Amortization of the below-market and above-market lease intangible is booked
to real estate expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.
(3) Refer to Note 8 for additional information on our remaining operating leases.
(4) Carrying value includes
intangible asset and
intangible asset at
(5) Includes
At
properties held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet.
(6) At
originally acquired in
there was one property held for sale that was acquired in
that was subsequently sold in
(7) Right of use assets, investments in real estate from lending activities
include a right of use asset associated with an acquired ground lease of
million accounted for as an operating lease and a below-market lease
intangible asset of
these right of use assets were reclassified to properties held for sale on
the consolidated balance sheet.
(8) Carrying value includes franchise agreement intangible assets of
and a customer list intangible asset of
held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet.
(9) Lease liabilities include one ground lease at a hotel property with a
remaining term of 93 years. Lease expenses for this liability for the three
and nine months ended
respectively.
(10) Excludes items of working capital, either acquired or assumed.
(Back to
Index)
52
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index) Financing Receivables The following tables show the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 and year endedDecember 31, 2021 (in thousands): Year Ended Nine Months Ended December 31, September 30, 2022 2021 Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period $ 8,805 $ 34,310 Provision for (reversal of) credit losses, net 1,342 (21,262 ) Charge offs (2,297 ) (4,243 ) Allowance for credit losses at end of period $ 7,850
$ 8,805
During the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , we recorded provisions for expected credit losses of$2.6 million and$1.3 million , respectively, primarily attributable to the negative impact of macroeconomic factors focused on increases in inflation, energy costs and interest rates, and to a lesser extent, by an increase in portfolio credit risk indicated in property-level cash flows that collateralize our loans. During the three months endedSeptember 30, 2021 , we recorded a provision for expected credit losses of$537,000 in connection with an increase in the size of the CRE loan portfolio, offset by an improvement in macroeconomic conditions. During the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2021 , we recorded a reversal of expected credit losses of$15.4 million in connection with declines in expected unemployment and continued improvement in macroeconomic factors, loan paydowns and improved collateral operating performance. AtSeptember 30, 2022 , we individually evaluated one retail loan in the Northeast region with a principal balance of$8.0 million and one office loan in the Southwest region with a principal balance of$21.8 million for which foreclosure was determined to be probable. Each loan had an as-is appraised value in excess of its principal balance, and, as such, had no CECL allowance atSeptember 30, 2022 . AtDecember 31, 2021 , two loans in addition to the previously discussed retail loan in the Northeast region were individually evaluated for impairment: a retail loan in the Pacific region and a hotel loan in East North Central region. Both loans were repaid inJanuary 2022 . The repayment of the retail loan in the Pacific region resulted in a charge off of$2.3 million against the allowance for credit losses. An individual CECL allowance was established for this loan during the fourth quarter of 2021.
Credit quality indicators
Commercial Real Estate Loans
CRE loans are collateralized by a diversified mix of real estate properties and are assessed for credit quality based on the collective evaluation of several factors, including but not limited to: collateral performance relative to underwritten plan, time since origination, current implied and/or re-underwritten loan-to-collateral value ("LTV") ratios, loan structure and exit plan. Depending on the loan's performance against these various factors, loans are rated on a scale from 1 to 5, with loans rated 1 representing loans with the highest credit quality and loans rated 5 representing loans with the lowest credit quality. Loans are rated a 2 at origination. The factors evaluated provide general criteria to monitor credit migration in our loan portfolio; as such, a loan's rating may improve or worsen, depending on new information received. (Back to Index) 53
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
The criteria set forth below should be used as general guidelines and,
therefore, not every loan will have all of the characteristics described in each
category below.
Risk Rating Risk Characteristics
1 • Property performance has surpassed underwritten expectations.
• Occupancy is stabilized, the property has had a history of consistently high occupancy, and the property has a diverse and high quality tenant mix.
2 • Property performance is consistent with underwritten expectations
and covenants and performance criteria are being met or exceeded. • Occupancy is stabilized, near stabilized or is on track with underwriting.
3 • Property performance lags behind underwritten expectations.
• Occupancy is not stabilized and the property has some tenancy rollover.
4 • Property performance significantly lags behind underwritten
expectations. Performance criteria and loan covenants have required occasional waivers. • Occupancy is not stabilized and the property has a large amount of tenancy rollover.
5 • Property performance is significantly worse than underwritten
expectations. The loan is not in compliance with loan
covenants and
performance criteria and may be in default. Expected sale proceeds would not be sufficient to pay off the loan at maturity. • The property has a material vacancy rate and significant rollover of remaining tenants. • An updated appraisal is required upon designation and
updated on an
as-needed basis.
All CRE loans are evaluated for any credit deterioration by debt asset
management and certain finance personnel on at least a quarterly basis.
Mezzanine loans and preferred equity investments may experience greater credit
risks due to their nature as subordinated investments.
For the purpose of calculating the quarterly provision for credit losses under CECL, we pool CRE loans based on the underlying collateral property type and utilize a probability of default and loss given default methodology for approximately one year after which we immediately revert to a historical mean loss ratio. In order to calculate the historical mean loss ratio, we utilize our full, 16-year underwriting history in the determination of historical losses, along with the market loss history from a selected population of loans from an engaged third-party provider's database that were similar to our loan types, loan sizes, durations, interest rate structures and general LTV profiles.
Credit risk profiles of CRE loans at amortized cost were as follows (in
thousands, except amounts in the footnotes):
Rating 1 Rating 2 Rating 3 Rating 4 Rating 5 Total (1) AtSeptember 30, 2022 : Whole loans, floating-rate $ -$ 1,823,014 $ 187,195 $ 92,953 $ 22,783 $ 2,125,945 Mezzanine loan - - - 4,700 - 4,700 Total $ -$ 1,823,014 $ 187,195 $ 97,653 $ 22,783 $ 2,130,645 AtDecember 31, 2021 : Whole loans, floating-rate $ -$ 1,456,330 $ 273,078 $ 123,762 $ 24,681 $ 1,877,851 Mezzanine loan - - - 4,700 - 4,700 Total $ -$ 1,456,330 $ 273,078 $ 128,462 $ 24,681 $ 1,882,551
(1) The total amortized cost of CRE loans excluded accrued interest receivable of
$9.6 million and$6.1 million atSeptember 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , respectively. (Back to Index) 54
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
Credit risk profiles of CRE loans by origination year at amortized cost were as
follows (in thousands, except amounts in footnotes):
2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 Prior Total (1) AtSeptember 30, 2022 : Whole loans, floating-rate: (2) Rating 2$ 504,092 $ 1,142,664 $ 135,432 $ 27,011 $ 13,815 $ -$ 1,823,014 Rating 3 - 110,043 10,275 22,234 44,643 187,195 Rating 4 - - - 28,460 64,493 - 92,953 Rating 5 - - - 22,783 - - 22,783
Total whole loans, floating-rate 504,092 1,252,707 145,707 100,488 122,951
- 2,125,945 Mezzanine loan (rating 4) - - - - 4,700 - 4,700 Total$ 504,092 $ 1,252,707 $ 145,707 $ 100,488 $ 127,651 $ -$ 2,130,645 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 Prior Total (1) AtDecember 31, 2021 : Whole loans, floating-rate: (2) Rating 2$ 1,230,810 $ 150,513 $ 55,510 $ 19,497 $ - $ -$ 1,456,330 Rating 3 33,781 24,604 136,305 60,888 - 17,500 273,078 Rating 4 - - 28,446 86,096 - 9,220 123,762 Rating 5 - - 22,385 - - 2,296 24,681 Total whole loans, floating-rate 1,264,591 175,117 242,646 166,481 - 29,016 1,877,851 Mezzanine loan (rating 4) - - - 4,700 - - 4,700 Total$ 1,264,591 $ 175,117 $ 242,646 $ 171,181 $ -$ 29,016 $ 1,882,551
(1) The total amortized cost of CRE loans excluded accrued interest receivable of
respectively.
(2) Acquired CRE whole loans are grouped within each loan’s year of origination.
At both
included in other assets that had no carrying value.
Loan Portfolio Aging Analysis
The following table presents the CRE loan portfolio aging analysis as of the dates indicated for CRE loans at amortized cost (in thousands, except amounts in footnotes): Greater Total Loans Total Loans than 90 Total Receivable > 90 Days 30-59 Days 60-89 Days Days (1) Past Due Current (2) (3) and Accruing AtSeptember 30, 2022 : Whole loans, floating-rate $ - $ -$ 29,775 $ 29,775 $ 2,096,170 $ 2,125,945 $ - Mezzanine loan - - - - 4,700 4,700 - Total $ - $ -$ 29,775 $ 29,775 $ 2,100,870 $ 2,130,645 $ - AtDecember 31, 2021 : Whole loans, floating-rate $ - $ -$ 19,916 $ 19,916 $ 1,857,935 $ 1,877,851 $ 19,916 Mezzanine loan - - - - 4,700 4,700 - Total $ - $ -$ 19,916 $ 19,916 $ 1,862,635 $ 1,882,551 $ 19,916
(1) During the three and nine months ended
interest income of
principal payment past due greater than 90 days at
the three and nine months ended
income of
past due greater than 90 days at
(2) Includes one whole loan with an amortized cost of
default at
(3) The total amortized cost of CRE loans excluded accrued interest receivable of
respectively.
AtSeptember 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , we had two and three CRE loans in maturity default, with total amortized costs of$29.8 million and$27.9 million , respectively. InJuly 2022 , we received the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure on a hotel property in the Northeast region that collateralized a whole loan with an amortized cost of$14.0 million and that was in maturity default atJune 30, 2022 . (Back to Index) 55
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
During the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , two whole loans in maturity default atDecember 31, 2021 paid off principal of$17.6 million . The payoff on one loan was the result of a discounted payoff and resulted in a realized loss of$2.3 million for which a CECL allowance was established atDecember 31, 2021 . AtSeptember 30, 2022 , two whole loans in maturity default, with a total amortized cost of$29.8 million , were past due on interest payments. Subsequent toSeptember 30, 2022 , one loan was brought current on interest payments but remains in maturity default.
At
default, with total amortized cost of
payments.
Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”)
During the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , we entered into nine agreements that extended six loans by a weighted average period of two months and, in certain cases, modified certain other loan terms. One formerly forborne loan was in maturity default atSeptember 30, 2022 .
No loan modifications during the nine months ended
resulted in TDRs.
Restricted Cash AtSeptember 30, 2022 , we had restricted cash of$16.0 million , which consisted of$15.4 million of restricted cash held within our five consolidated securitization entities and$595,000 held in escrow for deposits or tax payments at our real estate properties. AtDecember 31, 2021 , we had restricted cash of$248.4 million , which consisted of$248.1 million held within our seven consolidated securitization entities and$360,000 held in various reserve accounts. The decrease of$232.4 million was primarily attributable to loan purchase activity within two of our consolidated securitization entities.
Accrued Interest Receivable
The following table summarizes our accrued interest receivable at
2022
September 30, 2022 December 31, 2021 Net Change Accrued interest receivable from loans $ 9,570 $ 6,106$ 3,464 Accrued interest receivable from promissory note, escrow, sweep and reserve accounts 55 6 49 Total $ 9,625 $ 6,112$ 3,513
The increase of
attributable to rising coupon rates and an increased loan portfolio balance.
Other Assets
The following table summarizes our other assets at
September 30, 2022 December 31, 2021 Net Change Tax receivables and prepaid taxes 210 2,120 (1,910 ) Other prepaid expenses 2,970 1,367 1,603 Other receivables 2,581 1,573 1,008 Other assets, miscellaneous 532 21 511 Fixed assets - non-real estate 342 401 (59 ) Total $ 6,635 $ 5,482$ 1,153 The increase of$1.2 million in other assets was primarily attributable to incremental prepaid expenses and miscellaneous receivables from our real estate properties acquired in 2022 offset by the receipt of a$1.9 million tax refund that was previously receivable.
Deferred Tax Assets
At
zero, resulting from a full valuation allowance of
million
likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets would not be
realized. We will continue to evaluate our ability to realize the tax benefits
associated with deferred
(Back to Index) 56
——————————————————————————–
(Back to Index)
tax assets by analyzing forecasted taxable income using both historical and
projected future operating results, the reversal of existing temporary
differences, taxable income in prior carry back years (if permitted) and the
availability of tax planning strategies.
Core Asset Classes
Our investment strategy targets the following core asset class:
Core Asset Class Principal Investments Commercial real • First mortgage loans, which we refer to as whole estate-related assets loans; • First priority interests in first mortgage loans, which we refer to as A notes; • Subordinated interests in first mortgage loans, which we refer to as B notes; • Mezzanine debt related to CRE that is senior to the borrower's equity position but subordinated to other third-party debt; • Preferred equity investments related to CRE that are subordinate to first mortgage loans and are not collateralized by the property underlying the investment; and • CRE equity investments. Derivative Instruments Historically, we sought to mitigate the potential impact on net income (loss) of adverse fluctuations in interest rates incurred on our borrowings by entering into hedging agreements. We classified our interest rate hedges as cash flow hedges, which are hedges that eliminate the risk of changes in the cash flows of a financial asset or liability. We terminated interest rate swap positions associated with our prior financed CMBS portfolio inApril 2020 . At termination, we realized a loss of$11.8 million . AtSeptember 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , we had a loss of$7.1 million and$8.5 million , respectively, recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, which will be amortized into earnings over the remaining life of the debt. During the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , we recorded amortization expense of$438,000 and$1.4 million , respectively, reported in interest expense on the consolidated statements of operations. During the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2021 , we recorded amortization expense of$489,000 and$1.5 million , respectively, on the consolidated statement of operations. AtSeptember 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , we had unrealized gains of$279,000 and$347,000 , respectively, attributable to two terminated interest rate swaps, in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheets, to be accreted into earnings over the remaining life of the debt. During the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , we recorded accretion income, reported in interest expense on the consolidated statements of operations, of$23,000 and$68,000 , to accrete the accumulated other comprehensive income on the terminated swap agreements. During the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2021 , we recorded accretion income of$23,000 , and$68,000 , respectively.
The following tables present the effect of derivative instruments on our
consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended
2022
© Edgar Online, source