Ukraine this morning reported that it has temporarily suspended the movement of commercial ships on its Black Sea corridor citing the increased activity by Russian forces. While none of the foreign vessels have been approached, Ukraine cited Russian forces’ apparent placing of bottom mines on portions of the sea corridor.
Kyiv-based brokerage and consultancy Barva Invest posted reports on its social media saying that the Ukrainian Sea Ports Authority released a notice late on October 25 announcing the suspension of vessel movements along the corridor. Their analysts reported that vessels had already been stopped for the past two days noting that the port authority cited the “explosive threat” that arose as a result of increased Russian aviation activity.
The Joint Coordination Center of the Southern Operational Command had in the past few days reported the increase of Russian aircraft operating in the area along the shipping corridor. Yesterday they reported as part of the ongoing Russian air assault, fixed-wing planes “dropped four unidentified means of impact (probably bottom mines) in the Black Sea in the direction of navigation corridors of civil shipping.” This followed a report at the beginning of the week citing “another dropping of unidentified objects in the direction of humanitarian navigation corridors of civil shipping.” They also reported that two vessels with overwater rocket carriers, equipped with 16 Caliber-type rockets had been seen among the fleet of five Russian warships in the Black Sea.
Commenting on the situation in the Black Sea, the command today said “We will continue to monitor the situation and keep you updated as new information becomes available.” Their daily update also included details on 10 air strikes including damage to another grain terminal and warehouse.
It appears based on AIS signals that several bulkers are currently holding at anchor south of Sulina, Romania. Included in the grouping is the Calypso V (76,600 dwt), a Greek-owned bulker registered in Panama reporting on its AIS that it was heading to Chornomorsk, Ukraine. The vessel appears to have been holding for up to four days. There are no AIS signals coming from vessels in the main Ukrainian Black Sea ports.
“We expect a negative business reaction to the lack of predictability,” warns Barva Invest in its message.
The suspension comes just days after Ukraine highlighted its success at building traffic along the corridor. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a speech said they had reached 50 vessels departing Ukraine’s ports while predicting 50 more would soon be coming. Reuters is citing comments from First Deputy Farm Minister Taras Vysotskiy saying they could exceed one million tons of grain shipped along the corridor this month.
Originally announced on August 8 for “the safe evacuation of ships,” caught in the ports since the start of the war, vessels had been using the corridor for nearly two months. Five ships were evacuated while Ukraine also reported shipments of grains and foodstuffs as well as some iron products.

UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak revealed today that the UK is undertaking efforts to support commercial shipping in the Black Sea transporting grain from Ukraine and deterring Russian attacks on cargo ships. This comes as Russia has continued its nightly attacks on Ukraine’s Black Sea and Danube seaports despite continuing calls to resume the grain agreement.
On the eve of the G20 Summit starting in India, the prime minister’s office announced a series of new initiatives by the UK designed to promote global food security and respond to “Putin’s weaponization of Ukrainian grain.” The UK blames a spike in global food prices on Russia’s actions highlighting that since “Putin’s decision to rip up the initiative,” Russia has declared that all ships transiting to Ukrainian Black Sea ports are treated as military vessels irrespective of the cargo they are carrying.
In response, the UK said as part of its surveillance operations, “the Royal Air Force (RAF) aircraft are conducting flights over the area to deter Russia from carrying out illegal strikes against civilian vessels transporting grain.” The UK notes that Russia however did fire shots and board one cargo ship bound for one of Ukraine’s Danube ports, “Actions which may constitute a violation of International Humanitarian Law,” they said in their statement.
Since July, the UK assesses that Russia has also damaged or destroyed at least 26 civilian port facilities, warehouses, silos and grain elevators. These attacks they believe have directly reduced Ukraine’s export capacity by one-third and destroyed enough grain to feed more than one million people for an entire year.
Ukrainian officials highlight that the attacks are continuing with reports that 14 drones were destroyed over the Odesa region, including the Danube ports, on Thursday night. The Deputy Chairman of the Ukrainian Agrarian Council told the BBC that more than 270,000 tonnes of grain have been destroyed during the recent attacks. The attack on Wednesday night into Thursday morning lasted three hours with additional damage to grain silos and conveyors.
Before the war, the UK reports Ukraine was the world’s fifth largest wheat exporter, fourth largest corn exporter, and third largest rapeseed exporter. Grain accounted for 41 percent of Ukrainian export revenue, and almost two-thirds of the grain exported by the country goes to the developing world, said Sunak.
“We will use our intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance to monitor Russian activity in the Black Sea, call out Russia if we see warning signs that they are preparing attacks on civilian shipping or infrastructure in the Black Sea, and attribute attacks to prevent false flag claims that seek to deflect blame from Russia,” Sunak said outlining the UK efforts.
In November, the UK supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, will convene an international food security summit. The focus will be on tackling the causes of food insecurity and malnutrition. In addition, the UK will contribute £3 million to the World Food Program.
These efforts came as Ukraine reported it is expanding grain exports from the ports in neighboring Romania and now Croatia. Ukraine’s First Deputy Prime Minister admitted that Croatian ports are a “niche trade route,” but said it is popular and they look to increase exports along this route. Romanian previously said it was expanding access from the Danube to its seaport of Constanta. This is happening as Russia has not shown any willingness to restart the Black Sea grain agreements.
It is the second time Elena*, who lives in the Georgian capital Tbilisi, has opted to be a surrogate mother for an income.
With her own daughter requiring costly medical treatment and therapies to treat a health condition, Elena has found working as a surrogate mother a good way to support her family.
“The surrogacy programme helped me a lot with all of my daughter’s medical expenses and other household costs as well. It’s been a real relief for the whole family,” she told Al Jazeera.
Yet, this source of income could soon be cut off for Elena and other surrogate mothers in Georgia should the government’s proposed ban to prevent foreign couples from accessing commercial surrogacy services in the country be implemented next year as planned.
Announcing the plan for the ban in June, Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili said it was needed to protect both surrogate mothers and children and prevent human trafficking.
He also said that it was necessary to ensure babies did not end up with same-sex couples in contravention of Georgian legislation.
The non-commercial surrogacy services will remain legal only on the “principle of altruism” and exclusively for Georgian couples.
The draft law foresees compensation for costs related to medical examinations or labour. If approved, the bill, which will also prohibit adverts for surrogacy services, will enter into force on January 1 next year.
The war in Ukraine
Analysts say the move comes amid increased pressure on the country’s surrogacy sector after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine last February that prompted a brief slowing down of surrogacy operations in the war-torn country. Prior to the war, Ukraine was considered the biggest surrogacy hub in Europe.
Polina Vlasenko, a postdoctoral researcher in reproductive mobilities at Indiana University, who has conducted field research in Georgia prior to the coronavirus pandemic, told Al Jazeera that the expected ban was part of a wider political agenda of Georgia’s conservative government.
“Part of it is also populism and the government trying to tailor policies towards voters and what society expects it to do in relation to certain topics that are very sensitive, which surrogacy is,” she said.
“But if this goes through, it will be surrogate mothers who will be negatively affected. Instead of providing them with better protections and security provisions, the government is deciding to just ban the whole practice, which basically takes their job away from them,” Vlasenko added.
More broadly, it is the latest development within an already precarious sector that has been impacted by the war in Ukraine as well as alleged human trafficking scandals.
Last month, a large fertility clinic in Greece was accused of exploiting nearly 200 surrogate mothers from countries including Ukraine, Romania and Georgia.
The scandal left a number of intended parents and babies in legal limbo.

“There’s a lot of pressure on the sector internationally,” said Sam Everingham, the global director of prominent Sydney-based surrogacy networking organisation Growing Families.
“After the war broke out in Ukraine, fertility programmes shut down for about six months, and then clinics slowly reopened,” said Everingham, who had two daughters with his same-sex partner via surrogacy more than 10 years ago.
In the meantime, many Ukrainian surrogates moved to North Cyprus, Greece and Georgia, putting pressure on these smaller nations that do not have strong legal and regulatory frameworks, he told Al Jazeera.
“Now, we are dealing with the situation in Greece, while for intended parents, we are seeing the costs of surrogacy rising globally.”
Global surrogacy sector
A procedure that first became possible in the US about 30 years ago to support couples who cannot conceive naturally, commercial surrogacy remains illegal in many European nations.
Ukraine and Georgia are among the countries where for-profit companies have legally been allowed to operate.
While it is difficult to obtain accurate figures, research shows that about 2,000 babies were being born in Ukraine by surrogates before the outbreak of the war last year.
Denis Herman, the legal adviser at BioTexCom medical centre, one of Europe’s largest fertility clinics that opened in Kyiv in 2014, told Al Jazeera the initial period after Russia’s all-out war in Ukraine was hard but the company’s operations were currently back to pre-war levels.
“From the 28th week of pregnancy, we ask surrogate mothers to come to Kyiv, but after the invasion, it was hard to get mothers from eastern parts of Ukraine and in separatist regions here safely,” he said.
“There were a lot of checkpoints to pass and we had one case where one mother was stopped at a final checkpoint by Russian soldiers. The surrogate mother had to buy food at the nearest village, where she stayed for a few days. She later managed to be evacuated by another team of volunteers.”

Herman said that there were also hurdles for intended foreign parents, who despite the risks, have sought the services in the war-torn country.
The cost of BioTexCom’s surrogacy packages begins at 39,000 euros ($41,816).
“There were a lot of challenges for our intended parents because the babies were being born every day, and not all of the parents were able to go to Ukraine. Some couples from Europe visited us in their own cars and their own supply of petrol since at the time there was a big shortage,” Herman said.
Integrating tools picked up during the coronavirus pandemic, such as using the digital space to keep the process going, has helped the clinic get back to work.
“More than 600 babies have been born since the invasion. Now, everything works completely as it used to.”
Georgia absorbed some of the foreign clientele, a reverberation that analysts say continues to impact the surrogacy sector within Ukraine and beyond its borders despite the resumption of Ukrainian services.
“With Georgia being unable to cope with this increased demand since the outbreak of the war, what that’s meant now is increased pressure on places that have got reliable programmes like Canada and the USA, and increased uptake of programmes in countries which are sort of emerging, such as Argentina, Mexico and even Uganda,” said Everingham.
Analysts say that as surrogacy becomes increasingly common for couples, it is time for governments around the world to start to regulate the industry and increase protective measures.
“Some hard questions need to be asked of providers about what they’re doing to look after surrogates and vacuums need to be filled at a country level to ensure parents are protected from doing desperate things,” said Everingham.
Back in Georgia, surrogate mother Elena said that if the Georgian government does push through with the ban, she sees women emigrating.
“It will really make me sad if they actually pass a new law banning surrogacy for foreign patients,” she said.
“In my opinion, this is discrimination more than a valid bill. Everyone has the right to have a child and nationality does not matter. Patients respond to kindness with kindness and it’s a really amazing feeling to be able to fulfil the dreams of couples who have been waiting for a child for a long time,” Elena added.
Elena* chose to speak to Al Jazeera on condition of anonymity.
MENAFN06082023004812010992ID1106792619
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
On 22 June 2023, the Law of Ukraine No. 3137-IX “On the Introduction of Amendments to Some Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding the Optimisation of the State Property Fund of Ukraine, Improvement of State Property Management and Effectiveness of the Sanctions Policy” came into effect with provisions of this law related to the management of sanctioned assets to be effective on 22 September 2023.
The law enables large-scale privatisation of state assets and state companies while martial law is in place, enhances the centralisation of the State Property Fund of Ukraine, extends the powers of the State Property Fund of Ukraine to managing the sanctioned assets and simplifies the appointment of deputy heads of the State Property Fund and directors of state enterprises.
These developments resulted from Ukraine’s successful resumption of small-scale privatisation in 2022, are described in our previous materials.
Relaunch of large-scale privatisation
A large-scale privatisation relaunch was awaited given the burden of state enterprises on public funds, and the attractiveness of the large state assets to institutional investors in contrast with small ones. Consequently, the law grants the State Property Fund the authority to sell large assets both to domestic and foreign investors even during the martial law regime.
In recent interviews, Property Fund head Rustem Umerov pledged to launch the first large-scale privatisation auctions no later than the third quarter of 2023. The following assets are expected to be the first ones auctioned:
- Odesa Portside Plant PJSC – producer of ammonia and carbamide;
- United Mining and Chemical Company JSC, specialising in the development of titanium-zircon deposits and the production of rutile, ilmenite and zircon concentrate;
- Zaporizhzhya Titanium and Magnesium Plant LLC – producer of high-quality titanium products;
- Indar PRJSC – a company with a complete technological cycle of production of genetically engineered insulins from substance to finished dosage forms; and
- Centrenergo PJSC – one of the leading power generators within Ukraine.
More detailed information on state enterprises and assets subject to large-scale privatisation may be found via the web-site created by the Property Fund.
Centralised Property Fund and simplified appointment procedures
The regional branches will no longer exist as separate legal entities and will operate on behalf of the Property Fund. The law grants the head of the Property Fund, but not the President as previously stipulated, the authority to appoint deputy heads. In addition, the Law enables the appointment of directors for state-owned companies under the control of the Property Fund and heads of regional branches without the local authorities’ approval.
Management of sanctioned assets
Starting 22 September 2023, the Property Fund will be empowered to determine the enforcement procedures for court decisions on the recovery of assets belonging to an individual or a legal entity subject to sanctions.
The Property Fund will also manage sanctioned assets and will be entitled to dispose of sanctioned assets belonging residents of the states that carry out armed aggression against Ukraine (i.e. the Russian Federation).
Sovereign fund, a land bank and a state REIT
Property Fund head Umerov also recently revealed plans to establish a sovereign fund, a land bank, and a real estate investment fund, all of which will be under the Property Fund’s control.
All strategic enterprises and assets not subject to privatisation will be transferred to the sovereign fund by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. The asset list will include defence-related enterprises and objects of strategic importance, such as buildings of state and municipal authorities, subsoil, nationally significant minerals, objects of the national natural reserve fund, systems for creating and maintaining foreign exchange reserves and national registries. To establish the sovereign fund, on 10 June 2023, Property Fund signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Contango consultancy company, which supported the famous ADQ sovereign wealth fund established in the United Arab Emirates.
The State Property Fund has also undertaken other initiatives, including the establishment of the land bank and the real estate investment fund. The land bank is contemplated to serve as a unified entity with the authority to consolidate all state agricultural land parcels currently held by various entities that amount to approximately 750,000 hectares. In addition, the Property Fund plans to establish the real estate investment fund that will lease out infrastructure properties, such as ports, transportation and gas facilities, and forest land.
Legislation:
Law of Ukraine (Ukrainian text) suspending a large-scale privatisation
Law of Ukraine (Ukrainian text) relaunching a large-scale privatisation
MENAFN28062023003198003206ID1106511351
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
By David Stewart, Sam Sargent, and Carlo Franzoni
David is a London-based Oliver Wyman aviation partner who also supports Oliver Wyman CAVOK, the firm’s airline technical consulting business. Sam is a Boston-based principal in the aviation practice, and Carlo is a technical specialist with CAVOK in Atlanta.
The war in Ukraine and the subsequent prohibition against selling Russia Western-made aircraft and parts are taking a toll on the Russian commercial aviation industry. While Russia has been able to keep aircraft flying and people traveling so far— albeit almost entirely to domestic destinations — the nation’s commercial in-service fleet shrank 17% in 2022 year-over-year, with more to come this year and over the next 10.
The biggest decline was in the number of widebody aircraft, which decreased 48%. That drop was prompted by the loss of most international business after economic sanctions were imposed on Russia by the United States and other North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members after its invasion of Ukraine. By 2033, the Russian fleet will be 25% smaller than it was in January 2022 — a month before Russia’s attack, according to our analysis in the recently released Global Fleet and MRO Market Forecast 2023-2033.
Taking aircraft out of service is only part of the problem Russian airlines face; the other is keeping in-service jets flying. Unable to buy Western-manufactured equipment, Russian airlines — as early as July 2022 — had reportedly started to “cannibalize” aircraft in storage for replacement parts to support aircraft that were still in service. At the end of 2022, Rosaviatsia, the Federal Agency for Air Transport in Russia, gave permission to aircraft operators to use parts from cannibalized planes on the in-service fleet, another indication that the harvesting of parts had started.
Flying less
While some gray-market parts are probably making it through via countries still doing business with Russia, it’s more likely that Russia is able to keep flying at this point because its airlines are literally flying fewer aircraft less. Based on analysis from the Global Fleet Forecast, Russia’s fleet is flying almost 28% fewer hours and cycles compared with 2019, and to state the obvious, the less an aircraft is flown, the lower its maintenance requirements.
Russia represents about 3% of the global aviation market, so while the impact is substantial for its industry and economy, it has become only a small drag on the outlook for growth worldwide. Our analysis anticipates the global fleet surpasses its January 2020 peak size before the end of the year.
Still, geopolitical tensions have had an inordinate impact on aviation over the last 12 months. Besides disruption to flight paths over Russia, Ukraine sanctions have also unsettled global markets for commodities like steel, titanium, aluminum, nickel, and oil and gas — resources critical to aviation — because of fears of a cutoff of Russian supply. Titanium, for instance, makes up 14% of an A350 aircraft, and while purchase of Russian titanium was never prohibited, many suppliers switched away from using it. Titanium prices increased sharply in 2022, only to fall significantly in 2023. Similarly, the disruption in shipments of Russian oil and gas pushed up jet fuel prices globally in 2022.
Obstacles to new Russian narrowbody
The Western sanctions also may delay Russia’s previously announced plans to produce its own narrowbody aircraft. Before the war, Russian commercial aircraft tended to rely extensively on Western-made parts, including US-made engines. To build aircraft, Russia would have to design, develop, and produce its own components and engines. An indication of the difficulties facing Russian aerospace manufacturing was the recent sale of the stake in the Sukhoi Superjet 100 program held by the Russian state-owned aerospace company, United Aircraft Corporation.
Engines are also likely to be the biggest problem for maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) of the Western-made Russian fleet, according to a recent Forbes article. Fully built engines or expensive life-limited parts aren’t easily obtained on the black market, and MRO on engines is performed by a narrow circle of authorized shops — most of which operate out of the US and Europe. “If this war lasts five years, I don’t see Russia being able to fly Western commercial aircraft because all of the engines will have been burned out,” Abdol Moabery, founder of a Florida-based aircraft-parts distributor, told Forbes.
Even once the war is over, Russian aviation may find Western companies hesitant to do business after President Vladimir Putin prohibited leased Western aircraft from leaving Russia shortly after the invasion — essentially expropriating the planes. A few quick-moving lessors were able to extract a limited number, but the bulk are stuck in Russia. That hesitancy to do business with once-sanctioned countries isn’t unusual. Most are unable to pick up the business they had before sanctions, with companies in other countries fearing criticism or that sanctions will be slapped on again.
In response to Putin’s seizure of the aircraft, Western countries suspended their airworthiness certificates. Without these certificates, it would be difficult to sell the aircraft to non-Russian buyers. Most of them will end up being scrapped for parts, and those that aren’t will probably never leave Russia again.
When or if?
There is also no certainty that sanctions will be lifted in the next few years, depending on the outcome for the war. If, for instance, Russian forces managed to hold onto a significant chunk of Ukraine territory after fighting stops, it is possible Western allies would still not lift the prohibitions as the seizure would be seen as illegitimate.
Meanwhile, the Russian economy is paying a dear price for the 2022 invasion. Last year, it shrank 2.2%, according to the International Monetary Fund, the only region in the IMF World Economic Outlook for January 2023 to contract. This year and next, the economy will grow slowly, according to the IMF forecast. In 2023, the expectation is for only 0.3% growth, which would be the slowest anticipated among emerging market and developing economies.
While there’s no doubt the Russian industry will work hard to get back on a growth path, the sanctions are likely to serve as enough of an obstacle to prevent anything better than the ability to slow the decline.
Babies sleep next to each other in a makeshift nursery underground in the outskirts of Kyiv, Ukraine, Sunday, March 20, 2022.
Marcus Yam | Los Angeles Times | Getty Images
- An increasing number of women are turning to work as commercial surrogates in countries such as Georgia and Mexico amid growing global demand and the promise of good earnings.
- Commercial surrogacy refers to an arrangement in which a woman is paid a fee for carrying a pregnancy for another person or couple. This differs from altruistic surrogacy, where a surrogate is not compensated.
- The global commercial surrogacy industry grew to an estimated $14 billion in 2022. By 2032, that figure is forecast to rise to $129 billion.
Dilara has been living in Tbilisi, Georgia for several months now, turning her hand to various types of work, from hairdressing to shoemaking to waitressing.
But really, there’s just one job she wants: to carry someone else’s baby.
The widowed 34-year-old mother of four left her children with her parents in Uzbekistan last year, hoping to find work in the country’s nascent commercial surrogacy industry.
“I had loan debts from the bank and I have four children to take care of. They have school, they have expenses, you know. It’s hard on my own,” Dilara told CNBC.
Of course I would like to be a surrogate mother.
Dilara
Commercial surrogacy refers to an arrangement in which a woman is paid a fee for carrying a pregnancy for another person or couple. This differs from altruistic surrogacy, in which a woman volunteers to carry a pregnancy without any compensation beyond medical reimbursements.
Typically, commercial surrogacy is gestational surrogacy, meaning the surrogate has no biological link to the child.
The laws around surrogacy vary widely from country to country and state to state. In the U.S., for instance, the practice is permitted in some states but banned in others, while in Canada and the U.K., only altruistic surrogacy is allowed. In Georgia, meanwhile, as in Ukraine and Russia, both forms are legal.
Dilara is one of a growing number of women turning to commercial surrogacy as a source of income amid swelling global demand for carriers.
The global commercial surrogacy industry was worth an estimated $14 billion in 2022, according to market research consultancy Global Market Insights — though exact numbers are hard to verify given the private nature of many arrangements.
By 2032, that figure is forecast to rise to $129 billion, as infertility issues increase and a growing number of same-sex couples and single people look for ways to have babies.
That demand is driven primarily by so-called intended parents in wealthy, Western nations. Many of these are seeking cross-border surrogacy services to avoid long waiting lists or higher fees at home, or because domestic laws forbid surrogacy or exclude particular groups — such as gay couples — from the practice. The end of Covid-19 travel bans also led to an increase in global surrogacy demand last year.
“The pandemic reduced international surrogacy, but we’re now seeing all that pent up demand,” surrogacy expert Sam Everingham, who’s global director of Sydney, Australia-based surrogacy support group Growing Families, said.
Until last year, Ukraine was the world’s second-largest surrogacy market behind the U.S., attracting foreign would-be parents with lower fees and a favorable regulatory framework. Crucially, that includes naming intended parents on the baby’s birth certificate, rather than the surrogate mother.
But that all changed with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. Reports quickly emerged of surrogate mothers relocating to bomb shelters and prospective parents trying to enter Ukraine to be united with their surrogates.
A woman cares for a surrogate-born baby in a makeshift basement shelter in Kyiv, Ukraine following after Russia’s invasion.
Anastasia Vlasova | Getty Images News | Getty Images
“We had a lot of intended parents who were at different stages of the process with us,” said Olga Pysana, partner at Ukrainian surrogacy agency World Center of Baby, which at that time had 37 pregnant surrogates and 130 intended parents on its books. “We had to quickly come up with an alternative.”
The conflict pushed the industry into countries such as nearby Georgia, where the laws closely mirror Ukraine’s. World Center of Baby, which already had operations in Cyprus in 2022, plans to open its Georgia office this month. Mexico and parts of Latin America, meanwhile, have also seen a surge.
In Georgia, as in Ukraine, commercial surrogacy programs cost around $40,000-$50,000, while in Mexico they are about $60,000-$70,000. That compares with an average of $120,000 and higher in the U.S.
“Here in Mexico, we’re having again the boom around surrogacy, because Ukraine is closed,” Ernesto Noriega, chief executive and founder of Egg Donors Miracles, a fertility agency based in Cancun, Mexico, said, noting a 20%-30% increase in surrogacy arrangements last year.
The global boom has driven an uptick in demand for surrogates, with Facebook groups and agency adverts appealing to women with the promise of sizable incomes.
Lauragh from southeast Ireland, whose son was born in Oct. 2021, said her surrogate was able to buy a home for herself and her two daughters in Ukraine with her earnings from the program.
The main driving factor, whether in Ukraine, Georgia, Mexico … is the financial motivation behind it.
Olga Pysana
partner, World Center of Baby
“The main driving factor, whether in Ukraine, Georgia, Mexico — all the main markets — is the financial motivation behind it,” Pysana said of surrogates.
Indeed, Dilara was attracted by the prospect of higher earnings when she was first introduced to surrogacy by a colleague working with her at a call center. “If you want to do surrogacy, they give you good money,” she recalled being told by her younger female colleague.
However, the draw of women into the industry has raised concerns, not least for the often large disparity between agency fees and surrogates’ ultimate earnings. In many cases, a surrogate may earn less than a quarter of the tens of thousands of dollars charged to intended parents.
An embryologist assesses the quality of retrieved oocytes – a female germ cell – prior to fertilization.
World Center of Baby
“There is one thing I have been researching for two months about this job, and the doctors take $50,000, $60,000 from the parents and give from $12,000 to $20,000 to the surrogate mother,” Dilara said. “It’s unfair what they do.”
Pysana and Noriega, for their part, said their agency fees were justified due to the high medical expenses involved in the process, as well as the cost of housing and feeding surrogates in their final weeks of pregnancy. However, they acknowledged that corruption exists at other firms.
There are also substantial ethical issues surrounding commercial surrogacy, with critics arguing that the industry takes advantage of vulnerable women.
One prerequisite for many agencies, for instance, is that would-be surrogates are either widowed or single and that they already have at least one child. Agencies say this is to demonstrate a woman is physically and psychologically prepared for pregnancy, and to avoid any disputes with their partners.
This is not a good industry for women. For me, they are victims.
Teresa Ulloa Ziaurriz
regional director, CATWLAC
“This is not a good industry for women,” said Teresa Ulloa Ziaurriz, regional director at the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women and Girls in Latin America and the Caribbean (CATWLAC). “For me, they’re victims.”
Ulloa Ziaurriz said that in her experience working as a women’s reproductive lawyer across Latin America — chiefly in Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador and Mexico — agencies specifically target those facing financial hardship.
“After the pandemic, a lot of women lost their jobs. They looked for single women with children who desperately needed economic support,” she said of agencies, describing the process as a form of human trafficking.
The surrogacy process is also physically and psychologically demanding, and while most agencies require prospective carriers to undergo mental and physical health checks before entering into an arrangement, a lack of regulation leaves scope for mistreatment.
“There are no international standards and new programs are being launched in unregulated places,” Everingham said.
Some countries are now trying to right these shortcomings. In the U.K., for instance, regulatory authorities are working on a review to improve domestic surrogacy safeguards.
“While there is little we can do to alter surrogacy laws abroad, what we can do is ensure that the regime in the U.K. is well regulated and in the best interests of the child, surrogate and intended parents,” professor Nick Hopkins, family law commissioner at the Law Commission of England and Wales, said.
In the first three quarters of 2022, more than 400 parental orders were made for surrogate parents in the U.K. According to the Law Commission, the number of children born via surrogacy could be around 10 times higher today than it was a decade ago.
Women’s rights groups are calling for greater regulation of the commercial surrogacy industry.
Yuriy Dyachyshyn | Afp | Getty Images
But with no international coordination, Lauragh said the onus is on intended parents to do their research and ensure that surrogate mothers are given a fair deal.
“If you’re looking to undertake the process it’s your responsibility to do the research,” said Lauragh, noting that she insisted on having direct communication with her surrogate throughout the process. The two remain in touch today.
“There are some very cheap agencies out there, but if they’re cheap you can be sure that the surrogate is paying the price for it,” she added.
Still, surrogacy advocates insist that, aside from offering a path to parenthood for those who cannot conceive naturally, surrogacy can be enabling for women.
“If you speak to surrogates, they say that this is quite empowering,” Pysana said. “They have a feeling that they’re doing something great.”
Dilara, meanwhile, said her surrogacy journey remains ongoing.
“If there is a good hospital and they give me a good price, of course I would like to be a surrogate mother,” she said.
Mental health experts have rolled out a gaming app to help children who were traumatized by the war in Ukraine. Millions of youngsters were forced to leave their homes when Russia invaded Ukraine last year.
It was a mad dash for many to get out of Ukraine, including Natalia Levitska.
She said, “I just looked out my windows and I saw explosions.”
She uprooted her daughter, Polina, last May for a new and safer life in London. Her husband stayed behind in Kyiv to help the war effort.
“Not being together, it’s very difficult because I need to make a lot of decisions by myself,” she said.
While they left the war, the war never left Polina. The 6 year old felt anxious in her new home, until her mom found out about a phone app.
Levitska said, “I was, oh my god, that’s exactly what we need. That’s so cool.”
Designed by child psychotherapist Louis Weinstock, the game is called Apart Of Me, and it follows a young girl trapped in an enchanted forest.
Weinstock said, “The idea of a child being trapped in a tree is perhaps obviously also a metaphor for what can happen when we experience trauma that we can feel isolated, frozen in different ways.”
He now wants to get this game to more kids who are stuck inside Ukraine.
“There was an overwhelming need for some kind of digital mental health support, specifically focused on helping children and parents through the trauma of the war,” said Weinstock.
Levitska is working to translate the app, hoping that the power of play can help Ukrainian children through their darkest days.
According to the United Nations, the war in Ukraine has killed nearly 500 Ukrainian children and injured almost 1,000.